PKX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Molding Technologies has a net margin of 2.47% compared to POSCO Holdings's net margin of 4.33%. POSCO Holdings's return on equity of 2.14% beat Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91%.

POSCO Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.37%. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.15%. Given that POSCO Holdings has higher upside potential than Core Molding Technologies, analysts believe POSCO Holdings is more attractive than Core Molding Technologies.

POSCO Holdings has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.748, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.77%.

POSCO Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Core Molding Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POSCO Holdings pays 48.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. POSCO Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues of $73M. POSCO Holdings's net income of $333.8M is higher than Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M. Notably, POSCO Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while Core Molding Technologies's PE ratio is 9.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings is 0.26x versus 0.46x for Core Molding Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 2.47% compared to POSCO Holdings's net margin of 6.57%. POSCO Holdings's return on equity of 2.14% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 10.76%.

POSCO Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.37%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.93%. Given that POSCO Holdings has higher upside potential than Flexible Solutions International, analysts believe POSCO Holdings is more attractive than Flexible Solutions International.

POSCO Holdings has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.687%.

POSCO Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. POSCO Holdings pays 48.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 22.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $9.3M. POSCO Holdings's net income of $333.8M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of $611.9K. Notably, POSCO Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 10.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings is 0.26x versus 1.15x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ivanhoe Electric has a net margin of 2.47% compared to POSCO Holdings's net margin of -6443.52%. POSCO Holdings's return on equity of 2.14% beat Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -57.41%.

POSCO Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.37%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Electric has an analysts' consensus of $16.80 which suggests that it could grow by 135.13%. Given that Ivanhoe Electric has higher upside potential than POSCO Holdings, analysts believe Ivanhoe Electric is more attractive than POSCO Holdings.

POSCO Holdings has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

POSCO Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Ivanhoe Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POSCO Holdings pays 48.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. POSCO Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Ivanhoe Electric quarterly revenues of $671K. POSCO Holdings's net income of $333.8M is higher than Ivanhoe Electric's net income of -$43.2M. Notably, POSCO Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while Ivanhoe Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings is 0.26x versus 267.71x for Ivanhoe Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of 2.47% compared to POSCO Holdings's net margin of -7.87%. POSCO Holdings's return on equity of 2.14% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.89%.

POSCO Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.37%. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that POSCO Holdings has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe POSCO Holdings is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.

POSCO Holdings has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.791%.

POSCO Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POSCO Holdings pays 48.02% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. POSCO Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $25.1M. POSCO Holdings's net income of $333.8M is higher than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$2M. Notably, POSCO Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings is 0.26x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.