PKX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a net margin of 2.24% compared to POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -4.88%. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.46, signalling upside risk potential of 15.37%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.34 which suggests that it could fall by -0.15%. Given that POSCO Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe POSCO Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.215%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POSCO Holdings, Inc. pays 60.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.5B, which are larger than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $279.1M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M. Notably, POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.04x while Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings, Inc. is 0.37x versus 0.35x for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. has a net margin of 2.24% compared to POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.77%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.46, signalling upside risk potential of 15.37%. On the other hand Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $21.97 which suggests that it could fall by -0.46%. Given that POSCO Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd., analysts believe POSCO Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd..

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.432%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. POSCO Holdings, Inc. pays 60.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. pays out 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.5B, which are larger than Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $279.1M is higher than Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.04x while Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings, Inc. is 0.37x versus 3.21x for Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 2.24% compared to POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.99%. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.46, signalling upside risk potential of 15.37%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $180.54 which suggests that it could grow by 6.53%. Given that POSCO Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nucor Corp., analysts believe POSCO Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Nucor Corp..

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.125%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. POSCO Holdings, Inc. pays 60.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 25.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.5B, which are larger than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $279.1M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $681M. Notably, POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.04x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings, Inc. is 0.37x versus 1.23x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 2.24% compared to POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.37%. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.17% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $69.46, signalling upside risk potential of 15.37%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $190.37 which suggests that it could grow by 12.09%. Given that POSCO Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe POSCO Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.62%.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. POSCO Holdings, Inc. pays 60.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

POSCO Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.5B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.8B. POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $279.1M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M. Notably, POSCO Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.04x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POSCO Holdings, Inc. is 0.37x versus 1.45x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.