MTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of -0.63%. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.04% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $93.75, signalling upside risk potential of 33.05%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Minerals Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Minerals Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 9.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $524.7M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Minerals Technologies's net income of $46.7M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 1.15x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innospec has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of 7.53%. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.04% beat Innospec's return on equity of 12.17%.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $93.75, signalling upside risk potential of 33.05%. On the other hand Innospec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.29%. Given that Minerals Technologies has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Minerals Technologies is more attractive than Innospec.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innospec has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.261%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Innospec offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 9.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec pays out 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $524.7M, which are larger than Innospec quarterly revenues of $443.4M. Minerals Technologies's net income of $46.7M is higher than Innospec's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Innospec's PE ratio is 19.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 1.15x versus 1.46x for Innospec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of --. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.04% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $93.75, signalling upside risk potential of 33.05%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 232.41%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Minerals Technologies, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Minerals Technologies.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 9.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $524.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Minerals Technologies's net income of $46.7M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 1.15x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of --. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.04% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $93.75, signalling upside risk potential of 33.05%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 147.44%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Minerals Technologies, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Minerals Technologies.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 9.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $524.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Minerals Technologies's net income of $46.7M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.92x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 1.15x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.