MTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ashland, Inc. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -3.63%. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat Ashland, Inc.'s return on equity of -30.96%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Ashland, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.94%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ashland, Inc., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Ashland, Inc..

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ashland, Inc. has a beta of 0.430, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.954%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Ashland, Inc. offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland, Inc. pays out 46.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are larger than Ashland, Inc. quarterly revenues of $386M. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is higher than Ashland, Inc.'s net income of -$14M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while Ashland, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.10x versus 1.66x for Ashland, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntsman Corp. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -5.46%. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat Huntsman Corp.'s return on equity of -7.1%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Huntsman Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.69 which suggests that it could grow by 0.81%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Huntsman Corp., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Huntsman Corp..

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntsman Corp. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.002%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Huntsman Corp. offers a yield of 6.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntsman Corp. pays out 174% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Huntsman Corp.'s is not.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are smaller than Huntsman Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is higher than Huntsman Corp.'s net income of -$74M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while Huntsman Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.10x versus 0.38x for Huntsman Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic Co. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 12.29%. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat The Mosaic Co.'s return on equity of 10.32%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand The Mosaic Co. has an analysts' consensus of $32.27 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Mosaic Co., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than The Mosaic Co..

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic Co. has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.822%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. The Mosaic Co. offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic Co. pays out 154.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Mosaic Co.'s is not.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are smaller than The Mosaic Co. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is lower than The Mosaic Co.'s net income of $424.1M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while The Mosaic Co.'s PE ratio is 7.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.10x versus 0.79x for The Mosaic Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -1.25%. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.04%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $87.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.98%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc..

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has a beta of 2.223, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.303%.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $352.8M. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.10x versus 0.35x for Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.