How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Buy
60
MTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$65.94
Seasonality move
:
6.05%
Day range:
$63.65 - $68.18
52-week range:
$49.54 - $77.74
Dividend yield:
0.68%
P/E ratio:
1,354.63x
P/S ratio:
1.00x
P/B ratio:
1.22x
Volume:
739.5K
Avg. volume:
203.9K
1-year change:
-14.87%
Market cap:
$2B
Revenue:
$2.1B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.51
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTX
Minerals Technologies, Inc.
|
$517.8M | $1.28 | 4.98% | -23.82% | $81.75 |
|
ALB
Albemarle Corp.
|
$1.4B | -$0.53 | 18.49% | -10158.97% | $172.62 |
|
ASH
Ashland, Inc.
|
$478.6M | $1.21 | 3.24% | 64.91% | $65.20 |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -50% | $1.70 |
|
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.
|
$364.1M | -$0.08 | -0.13% | -91.71% | $9.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTX
Minerals Technologies, Inc.
|
$65.76 | $81.75 | $2B | 1,354.63x | $0.12 | 0.68% | 1.00x |
|
ALB
Albemarle Corp.
|
$170.63 | $172.62 | $20.1B | 43.27x | $0.41 | 0.95% | 4.06x |
|
ASH
Ashland, Inc.
|
$61.16 | $65.20 | $2.8B | 21.24x | $0.42 | 2.7% | 1.56x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
$1.77 | $1.70 | $138.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.
|
$7.76 | $9.00 | $520M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.35x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTX
Minerals Technologies, Inc.
|
35.95% | 1.304 | 49.73% | 1.32x |
|
ALB
Albemarle Corp.
|
27.36% | 0.980 | 31.75% | 1.33x |
|
ASH
Ashland, Inc.
|
43.9% | -0.478 | 67.61% | 1.20x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
27.01% | 1.400 | 12.18% | 1.08x |
|
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.
|
70.86% | 2.731 | 165.46% | 0.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTX
Minerals Technologies, Inc.
|
$124.5M | $66.5M | -0.52% | -0.82% | 12.8% | $43.6M |
|
ALB
Albemarle Corp.
|
$117.6M | -$30.5M | 0.15% | 0.21% | -2.33% | $223.4M |
|
ASH
Ashland, Inc.
|
$143M | $61M | -21.45% | -34.8% | 12.76% | $6M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-$95.7K | -$1.5M | -25.69% | -34.36% | -- | -$1.1M |
|
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.
|
$34.1M | $10.1M | -30.77% | -73.04% | 2.88% | -$41.5M |
Minerals Technologies, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MTX or ALB?
Albemarle Corp. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -11.31%. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat Albemarle Corp.'s return on equity of 0.21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.23.97% $1.19 $2.7B ALBAlbemarle Corp.8.99% -$1.72 $14B -
What do Analysts Say About MTX or ALB?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 24.32%. On the other hand Albemarle Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.17%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Albemarle Corp., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Albemarle Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.3 0 0 ALBAlbemarle Corp.10 14 0 -
Is MTX or ALB More Risky?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Albemarle Corp. has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.958%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MTX or ALB?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Albemarle Corp. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle Corp. pays out 27.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MTX or ALB?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are smaller than Albemarle Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is higher than Albemarle Corp.'s net income of -$147.9M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while Albemarle Corp.'s PE ratio is 43.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.00x versus 4.06x for Albemarle Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.1.00x 1,354.63x $519.5M $38.4M ALBAlbemarle Corp.4.06x 43.27x $1.3B -$147.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns MTX or ASH?
Ashland, Inc. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 6.9%. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat Ashland, Inc.'s return on equity of -34.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.23.97% $1.19 $2.7B ASHAshland, Inc.29.92% $0.70 $3.4B -
What do Analysts Say About MTX or ASH?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 24.32%. On the other hand Ashland, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.20 which suggests that it could grow by 6.61%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ashland, Inc., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Ashland, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.3 0 0 ASHAshland, Inc.7 4 0 -
Is MTX or ASH More Risky?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ashland, Inc. has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.449%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MTX or ASH?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Ashland, Inc. offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland, Inc. pays out 46.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MTX or ASH?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are larger than Ashland, Inc. quarterly revenues of $478M. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is higher than Ashland, Inc.'s net income of $33M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while Ashland, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.00x versus 1.56x for Ashland, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.1.00x 1,354.63x $519.5M $38.4M ASHAshland, Inc.1.56x 21.24x $478M $33M
-
Which has Higher Returns MTX or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.23.97% $1.19 $2.7B PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -$0.06 $43.2M -
What do Analysts Say About MTX or PZG?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 24.32%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could fall by -3.96%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.3 0 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.1 0 0 -
Is MTX or PZG More Risky?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.562%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MTX or PZG?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MTX or PZG?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.00x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.1.00x 1,354.63x $519.5M $38.4M PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -- -- -$4.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MTX or RYAM?
Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -1.25%. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.23.97% $1.19 $2.7B RYAMRayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.9.66% -$0.07 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MTX or RYAM?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 24.32%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.98%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.3 0 0 RYAMRayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MTX or RYAM More Risky?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has a beta of 2.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.044%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MTX or RYAM?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MTX or RYAM?
Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $519.5M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $352.8M. Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,354.63x while Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies, Inc. is 1.00x versus 0.35x for Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MTXMinerals Technologies, Inc.1.00x 1,354.63x $519.5M $38.4M RYAMRayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.0.35x -- $352.8M -$4.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Alerts
Sell
40
GDXU alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 38.85% over the past day.
Sell
34
PFSI alert for Jan 31
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 33.21% over the past day.
Sell
40
SHNY alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 31.56% over the past day.
