ASH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 6.9% compared to Ashland, Inc.'s net margin of 7.39%. Ashland, Inc.'s return on equity of -34.8% beat Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.82%.

Ashland, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.61%. On the other hand Minerals Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.32%. Given that Minerals Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ashland, Inc., analysts believe Minerals Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Ashland, Inc..

Ashland, Inc. has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Minerals Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.943%.

Ashland, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Minerals Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Ashland, Inc. pays 46.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies, Inc. pays out 7.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashland, Inc. quarterly revenues are $478M, which are smaller than Minerals Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $519.5M. Ashland, Inc.'s net income of $33M is lower than Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $38.4M. Notably, Ashland, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Minerals Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1,354.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashland, Inc. is 1.56x versus 1.00x for Minerals Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 6.9% compared to Ashland, Inc.'s net margin of --. Ashland, Inc.'s return on equity of -34.8% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Ashland, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.61%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could fall by -3.96%. Given that Ashland, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe Ashland, Inc. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..

Ashland, Inc. has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.562%.

Ashland, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ashland, Inc. pays 46.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashland, Inc. quarterly revenues are $478M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Ashland, Inc.'s net income of $33M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Ashland, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashland, Inc. is 1.56x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 6.9% compared to Ashland, Inc.'s net margin of --. Ashland, Inc.'s return on equity of -34.8% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Ashland, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.61%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 92.36%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Ashland, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Ashland, Inc..

Ashland, Inc. has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.124%.

Ashland, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ashland, Inc. pays 46.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashland, Inc. quarterly revenues are $478M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Ashland, Inc.'s net income of $33M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Ashland, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashland, Inc. is 1.56x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.