MMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.5%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat FTI Consulting, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.83%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.72%. On the other hand FTI Consulting, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $174.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.46%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than FTI Consulting, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 41.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting, Inc. has a beta of 0.092, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.796%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. FTI Consulting, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than FTI Consulting, Inc. quarterly revenues of $990.7M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than FTI Consulting, Inc.'s net income of $54.5M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while FTI Consulting, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.75x versus 1.41x for FTI Consulting, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 55.37%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of 104.65%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.72%. On the other hand Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16566.67%. Given that Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 41.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has a beta of 5.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 457.024%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.75x versus 0.12x for Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 6.94%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.52%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.72%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $215.50 which suggests that it could grow by 70.06%. Given that Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe Huron Consulting Group, Inc. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 41.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.578%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $442M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.75x versus 1.34x for Huron Consulting Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 3.9%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat ICF International, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.15%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.72%. On the other hand ICF International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.25 which suggests that it could grow by 53.96%. Given that ICF International, Inc. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe ICF International, Inc. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 41.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International, Inc. has a beta of 0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.862%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. ICF International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International, Inc. pays out 11.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than ICF International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $443.7M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than ICF International, Inc.'s net income of $17.3M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.89x while ICF International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.75x versus 0.68x for ICF International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.