MMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 8.66%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat FTI Consulting, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.9%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.28%. On the other hand FTI Consulting, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $177.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.02%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than FTI Consulting, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.566, which suggesting that the stock is 43.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting, Inc. has a beta of 0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.551%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. FTI Consulting, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than FTI Consulting, Inc. quarterly revenues of $956.2M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than FTI Consulting, Inc.'s net income of $82.8M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while FTI Consulting, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.79x versus 1.51x for FTI Consulting, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 49.14%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.67%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.28%. On the other hand Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12400%. Given that Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.566, which suggesting that the stock is 43.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has a beta of 6.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 539.926%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s net income of $1M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.79x versus 0.25x for Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.22%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.28%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $215.50 which suggests that it could grow by 71.91%. Given that Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe Huron Consulting Group, Inc. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.566, which suggesting that the stock is 43.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.083, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.664%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $441.3M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s net income of $30.4M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.79x versus 1.37x for Huron Consulting Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International, Inc. has a net margin of 6.98% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.11%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92% beat ICF International, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.98%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.28%. On the other hand ICF International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $108.75 which suggests that it could grow by 41.22%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than ICF International, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than ICF International, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.566, which suggesting that the stock is 43.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International, Inc. has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.803%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. ICF International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International, Inc. pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than ICF International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.4M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M is higher than ICF International, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while ICF International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.79x versus 0.74x for ICF International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.