MMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 8.66%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat FTI Consulting, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.9%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand FTI Consulting, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $177.50 which suggests that it could fall by -2.49%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than FTI Consulting, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting, Inc. has a beta of 0.089, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.104%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. FTI Consulting, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than FTI Consulting, Inc. quarterly revenues of $956.2M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is lower than FTI Consulting, Inc.'s net income of $82.8M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while FTI Consulting, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 1.05x versus 1.69x for FTI Consulting, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.22%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $215.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.25%. Given that Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe Huron Consulting Group, Inc. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.153%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $441.3M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is higher than Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s net income of $30.4M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 1.05x versus 1.90x for Huron Consulting Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.11%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat ICF International, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.98%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand ICF International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $108.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.33%. Given that ICF International, Inc. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe ICF International, Inc. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International, Inc. has a beta of 0.422, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.771%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. ICF International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International, Inc. pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than ICF International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.4M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is higher than ICF International, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while ICF International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 1.05x versus 0.93x for ICF International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Initio, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of --. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Initio, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand Initio, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Initio, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than Initio, Inc..

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio, Inc. has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.06%.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Initio, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Initio, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Initio, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is higher than Initio, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Initio, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 1.05x versus -- for Initio, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.