Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
55
MMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$86.87
Seasonality move
:
1.9%
Day range:
$86.31 - $87.49
52-week range:
$63.77 - $92.50
Dividend yield:
1.38%
P/E ratio:
15.64x
P/S ratio:
0.92x
P/B ratio:
2.83x
Volume:
189.2K
Avg. volume:
728.7K
1-year change:
19.14%
Market cap:
$4.7B
Revenue:
$5.4B
EPS (TTM):
$5.56
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
$1.3B | $1.67 | -1.98% | 165.07% | $107.50 |
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
$3B | $1.51 | -6.05% | -12.56% | $100.27 |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
$945.1M | $1.99 | 2.66% | 5.07% | $166.00 |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
$420M | $1.87 | 8.58% | 6.26% | $202.50 |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
$485.1M | $1.73 | -11.17% | 14.78% | $106.75 |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
$86.94 | $107.50 | $4.7B | 15.64x | $0.30 | 1.38% | 0.92x |
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
$85.10 | $100.27 | $10.3B | 12.99x | $0.55 | 2.59% | 0.91x |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
$175.85 | $166.00 | $5.4B | 22.36x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.63x |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
$180.06 | $202.50 | $3.1B | 30.18x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.97x |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
$86.48 | $106.75 | $1.6B | 16.30x | $0.14 | 0.65% | 0.84x |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
$0.2000 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
46.31% | 0.439 | 28.84% | 1.53x |
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
80.69% | -0.133 | 34.12% | 1.65x |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
30.54% | 0.413 | 15.18% | 1.71x |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
56.57% | 0.369 | 25.73% | 1.32x |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
37.86% | 0.533 | 36.47% | 1.27x |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
-- | 0.753 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
$310.5M | $123.6M | 9.82% | 18.54% | 9.37% | $641.8M |
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
$591M | $283M | 16.25% | 74.95% | 9.79% | $395M |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
$317.2M | $117.7M | 10.48% | 12.9% | 12.31% | $187M |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
$134.8M | $55.9M | 10.04% | 21.22% | 12.66% | $85.3M |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
$160.7M | $38.8M | 6.08% | 9.98% | 8.34% | $41.8M |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MAXIMUS, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MMS or BAH?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 6.02%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 74.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.23.56% $1.32 $3.1B BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.20.45% $1.42 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MMS or BAH?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $100.27 which suggests that it could grow by 18.46%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0 0 0 BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.2 8 1 -
Is MMS or BAH More Risky?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.337, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.303%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMS or BAH?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays out 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMS or BAH?
MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is lower than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $174M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.92x versus 0.91x for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0.92x 15.64x $1.3B $75.3M BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.0.91x 12.99x $2.9B $174M
-
Which has Higher Returns MMS or FCN?
FTI Consulting, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 8.66%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat FTI Consulting, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.23.56% $1.32 $3.1B FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.33.17% $2.60 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About MMS or FCN?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand FTI Consulting, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $166.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.6%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than FTI Consulting, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0 0 0 FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.1 2 0 -
Is MMS or FCN More Risky?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting, Inc. has a beta of 0.105, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.5%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMS or FCN?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. FTI Consulting, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMS or FCN?
MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than FTI Consulting, Inc. quarterly revenues of $956.2M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is lower than FTI Consulting, Inc.'s net income of $82.8M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while FTI Consulting, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.92x versus 1.63x for FTI Consulting, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0.92x 15.64x $1.3B $75.3M FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.1.63x 22.36x $956.2M $82.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns MMS or HURN?
Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.23.56% $1.32 $3.1B HURNHuron Consulting Group, Inc.30.55% $1.71 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MMS or HURN?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $202.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.46%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0 0 0 HURNHuron Consulting Group, Inc.4 0 0 -
Is MMS or HURN More Risky?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.183, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.684%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMS or HURN?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMS or HURN?
MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $441.3M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is higher than Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s net income of $30.4M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.92x versus 1.97x for Huron Consulting Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0.92x 15.64x $1.3B $75.3M HURNHuron Consulting Group, Inc.1.97x 30.18x $441.3M $30.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns MMS or ICFI?
ICF International, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.11%. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat ICF International, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.23.56% $1.32 $3.1B ICFIICF International, Inc.34.53% $1.28 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About MMS or ICFI?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand ICF International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $106.75 which suggests that it could grow by 23.44%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than ICF International, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than ICF International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0 0 0 ICFIICF International, Inc.3 1 0 -
Is MMS or ICFI More Risky?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International, Inc. has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.521%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMS or ICFI?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. ICF International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International, Inc. pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMS or ICFI?
MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than ICF International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.4M. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is higher than ICF International, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while ICF International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.92x versus 0.84x for ICF International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0.92x 15.64x $1.3B $75.3M ICFIICF International, Inc.0.84x 16.30x $465.4M $23.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns MMS or INTO?
Initio, Inc. has a net margin of 5.71% compared to MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net margin of --. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Initio, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.23.56% $1.32 $3.1B INTOInitio, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MMS or INTO?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.65%. On the other hand Initio, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Initio, Inc., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than Initio, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0 0 0 INTOInitio, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MMS or INTO More Risky?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio, Inc. has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.707%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MMS or INTO?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Initio, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Initio, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MMS or INTO?
MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Initio, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M is higher than Initio, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, MAXIMUS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.64x while Initio, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MAXIMUS, Inc. is 0.92x versus -- for Initio, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0.92x 15.64x $1.3B $75.3M INTOInitio, Inc.-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
