FCN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CRA International has a net margin of 5.56% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 8.49%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 13.09% beat CRA International's return on equity of 22.6%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $196.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand CRA International has an analysts' consensus of $235.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.99%. Given that CRA International has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe CRA International is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRA International has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.826%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRA International offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International pays out 26.37% of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $894.9M, which are larger than CRA International quarterly revenues of $176.4M. FTI Consulting's net income of $49.7M is higher than CRA International's net income of $15M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while CRA International's PE ratio is 25.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.57x versus 1.74x for CRA International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 5.56% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 8.51%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 13.09% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 22.32%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $196.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of $169.25 which suggests that it could grow by 18.94%. Given that FTI Consulting has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe FTI Consulting is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.859%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $894.9M, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $399.3M. FTI Consulting's net income of $49.7M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $34M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 22.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.57x versus 1.74x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 5.56% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 4.95%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 13.09% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.63%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $196.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $108.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.33%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.532%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 9.54% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $894.9M, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $496.3M. FTI Consulting's net income of $49.7M is higher than ICF International's net income of $24.6M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while ICF International's PE ratio is 14.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.57x versus 0.81x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maximus has a net margin of 5.56% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 2.94%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 13.09% beat Maximus's return on equity of 16.11%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $196.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand Maximus has an analysts' consensus of $102.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.54%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maximus has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.99%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maximus offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus pays out 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $894.9M, which are smaller than Maximus quarterly revenues of $1.4B. FTI Consulting's net income of $49.7M is higher than Maximus's net income of $41.2M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Maximus's PE ratio is 14.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.57x versus 0.77x for Maximus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.