Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
17
BAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$84.88
Seasonality move
:
0.73%
Day range:
$84.10 - $85.24
52-week range:
$79.23 - $146.95
Dividend yield:
2.61%
P/E ratio:
12.88x
P/S ratio:
0.90x
P/B ratio:
10.27x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
2.8M
1-year change:
-34.45%
Market cap:
$10.2B
Revenue:
$12B
EPS (TTM):
$6.55
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
$2.7B | $1.27 | -6.05% | -12.56% | $100.27 |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
$918.7M | $1.46 | 2.66% | 5.07% | $166.00 |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
$433.6M | $1.95 | 8.58% | 6.26% | $202.50 |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
$440.9M | $1.49 | -11.17% | 14.78% | $106.75 |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
$1.4B | $1.82 | -1.98% | 165.07% | $107.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
$84.36 | $100.27 | $10.2B | 12.88x | $0.55 | 2.61% | 0.90x |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
$170.83 | $166.00 | $5.3B | 21.72x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.58x |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
$172.91 | $202.50 | $3B | 28.98x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.89x |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
$85.30 | $106.75 | $1.6B | 16.07x | $0.14 | 0.66% | 0.83x |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
$0.2000 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
$86.32 | $107.50 | $4.7B | 15.53x | $0.30 | 1.39% | 0.92x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
80.69% | -0.522 | 34.12% | 1.65x |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
30.54% | 0.244 | 15.18% | 1.71x |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
56.57% | 0.327 | 25.73% | 1.32x |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
37.86% | 0.083 | 36.47% | 1.27x |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
-- | 0.931 | -- | -- |
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
46.31% | 0.454 | 28.84% | 1.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.
|
$591M | $283M | 16.25% | 74.95% | 9.79% | $395M |
|
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
|
$317.2M | $117.7M | 10.48% | 12.9% | 12.31% | $187M |
|
HURN
Huron Consulting Group, Inc.
|
$134.8M | $55.9M | 10.04% | 21.22% | 12.66% | $85.3M |
|
ICFI
ICF International, Inc.
|
$160.7M | $38.8M | 6.08% | 9.98% | 8.34% | $41.8M |
|
INTO
Initio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMS
MAXIMUS, Inc.
|
$310.5M | $123.6M | 9.82% | 18.54% | 9.37% | $641.8M |
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BAH or FCN?
FTI Consulting, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 8.66%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 74.95% beat FTI Consulting, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.20.45% $1.42 $5.2B FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.33.17% $2.60 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BAH or FCN?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.86%. On the other hand FTI Consulting, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $166.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.83%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, Inc., analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is more attractive than FTI Consulting, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.2 8 1 FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.1 2 0 -
Is BAH or FCN More Risky?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting, Inc. has a beta of 0.089, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.104%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAH or FCN?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. FTI Consulting, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BAH or FCN?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than FTI Consulting, Inc. quarterly revenues of $956.2M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $174M is higher than FTI Consulting, Inc.'s net income of $82.8M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while FTI Consulting, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.90x versus 1.58x for FTI Consulting, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.0.90x 12.88x $2.9B $174M FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.1.58x 21.72x $956.2M $82.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns BAH or HURN?
Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 6.89%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 74.95% beat Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.20.45% $1.42 $5.2B HURNHuron Consulting Group, Inc.30.55% $1.71 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About BAH or HURN?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.86%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $202.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.11%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, Inc., analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.2 8 1 HURNHuron Consulting Group, Inc.4 0 0 -
Is BAH or HURN More Risky?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.153%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAH or HURN?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BAH or HURN?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $441.3M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $174M is higher than Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s net income of $30.4M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.90x versus 1.89x for Huron Consulting Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.0.90x 12.88x $2.9B $174M HURNHuron Consulting Group, Inc.1.89x 28.98x $441.3M $30.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns BAH or ICFI?
ICF International, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 5.11%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 74.95% beat ICF International, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.20.45% $1.42 $5.2B ICFIICF International, Inc.34.53% $1.28 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BAH or ICFI?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.86%. On the other hand ICF International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $106.75 which suggests that it could grow by 25.15%. Given that ICF International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe ICF International, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.2 8 1 ICFIICF International, Inc.3 1 0 -
Is BAH or ICFI More Risky?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International, Inc. has a beta of 0.422, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.771%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAH or ICFI?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. ICF International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International, Inc. pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BAH or ICFI?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than ICF International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.4M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $174M is higher than ICF International, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while ICF International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.90x versus 0.83x for ICF International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.0.90x 12.88x $2.9B $174M ICFIICF International, Inc.0.83x 16.07x $465.4M $23.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns BAH or INTO?
Initio, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of --. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 74.95% beat Initio, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.20.45% $1.42 $5.2B INTOInitio, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BAH or INTO?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.86%. On the other hand Initio, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Initio, Inc., analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is more attractive than Initio, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.2 8 1 INTOInitio, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is BAH or INTO More Risky?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio, Inc. has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.06%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAH or INTO?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Initio, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Initio, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BAH or INTO?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Initio, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $174M is higher than Initio, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while Initio, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.90x versus -- for Initio, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.0.90x 12.88x $2.9B $174M INTOInitio, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BAH or MMS?
MAXIMUS, Inc. has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 5.71%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 74.95% beat MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.20.45% $1.42 $5.2B MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.23.56% $1.32 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BAH or MMS?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.86%. On the other hand MAXIMUS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $107.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.54%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.2 8 1 MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is BAH or MMS More Risky?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.214%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BAH or MMS?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. MAXIMUS, Inc. offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays out 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BAH or MMS?
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $174M is higher than MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.88x while MAXIMUS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.90x versus 0.92x for MAXIMUS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.0.90x 12.88x $2.9B $174M MMSMAXIMUS, Inc.0.92x 15.53x $1.3B $75.3M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
45
CTEV alert for Jan 2
Claritev Corp. [CTEV] is down 20.7% over the past day.
Sell
47
ASTS alert for Jan 2
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 14.94% over the past day.
Sell
45
BIDU alert for Jan 2
Baidu, Inc. [BIDU] is up 15.01% over the past day.
