BAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 7.18%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 16.4%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $170.11, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.33%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 48.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.553%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $378.1M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 26.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.49x versus 1.56x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 6.32%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.6%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $170.11, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.18%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 48.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.825%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $517M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than ICF International's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while ICF International's PE ratio is 20.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.49x versus 1.13x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Initio has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of --. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat Initio's return on equity of --.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $170.11, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand Initio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has higher upside potential than Initio, analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is more attractive than Initio.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 48.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio has a beta of -0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.339%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Initio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Initio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Initio quarterly revenues of --. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than Initio's net income of --. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Initio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.49x versus -- for Initio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maximus has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 5.51%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat Maximus's return on equity of 17.37%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $170.11, signalling upside risk potential of 29.67%. On the other hand Maximus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.29%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 48.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maximus has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.015%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Maximus offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus pays out 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Maximus quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than Maximus's net income of $72.5M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.63x while Maximus's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.49x versus 0.85x for Maximus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.