BAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 6.89%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 78.58% beat Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.22%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $106.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.08%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $215.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.24%. Given that Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe Huron Consulting Group, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.558% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.083, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.664%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $441.3M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $198M is higher than Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s net income of $30.4M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.64x while Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.92x versus 1.81x for Huron Consulting Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International, Inc. has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 5.11%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 78.58% beat ICF International, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.98%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $106.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.08%. On the other hand ICF International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $108.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.74%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than ICF International, Inc., analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is more attractive than ICF International, Inc..

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.558% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International, Inc. has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.803%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. ICF International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International, Inc. pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than ICF International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.4M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $198M is higher than ICF International, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.64x while ICF International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.92x versus 0.88x for ICF International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 5.71%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 78.58% beat MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $106.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.08%. On the other hand MAXIMUS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $110.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.41%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than MAXIMUS, Inc., analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is more attractive than MAXIMUS, Inc..

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.558% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.566, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.42%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. MAXIMUS, Inc. offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays out 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $198M is higher than MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $75.3M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.64x while MAXIMUS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.92x versus 1.00x for MAXIMUS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.