BAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 55.37%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 78.58% beat Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of 88.75%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $102.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49900%. Given that Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. has a beta of 5.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 428.797%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $198M is higher than Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.92x versus 0.03x for Golden Triangle Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 6.94%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 78.58% beat Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.52%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $102.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $215.50 which suggests that it could grow by 63.73%. Given that Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe Huron Consulting Group, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.769%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $442M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $198M is higher than Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Huron Consulting Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.92x versus 1.40x for Huron Consulting Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International, Inc. has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 3.9%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 78.58% beat ICF International, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.15%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $102.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand ICF International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.25 which suggests that it could grow by 55.76%. Given that ICF International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe ICF International, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International, Inc. has a beta of 0.532, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.757%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. ICF International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International, Inc. pays out 11.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than ICF International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $443.7M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $198M is higher than ICF International, Inc.'s net income of $17.3M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while ICF International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.92x versus 0.67x for ICF International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MAXIMUS, Inc. has a net margin of 7.56% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net margin of 6.98%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 78.58% beat MAXIMUS, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.92%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $102.33, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand MAXIMUS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $110.00 which suggests that it could grow by 68.84%. Given that MAXIMUS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., analysts believe MAXIMUS, Inc. is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp..

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.354, which suggesting that the stock is 64.621% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MAXIMUS, Inc. has a beta of 0.630, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.966%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. MAXIMUS, Inc. offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. pays 28.69% of its earnings as a dividend. MAXIMUS, Inc. pays out 21.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than MAXIMUS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s net income of $198M is higher than MAXIMUS, Inc.'s net income of $93.9M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while MAXIMUS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. is 0.92x versus 0.70x for MAXIMUS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.