MFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 10.82% compared to Manulife Financial Corp.'s net margin of 6.43%. Manulife Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.6% beat Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling downside risk potential of -13.44%. On the other hand Jackson Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $112.67 which suggests that it could grow by 4.12%. Given that Jackson Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial Corp., analysts believe Jackson Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Manulife Financial Corp..

Manulife Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Jackson Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Manulife Financial Corp. pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays out 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Manulife Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M. Notably, Manulife Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.23x while Jackson Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial Corp. is 1.50x versus 1.60x for Jackson Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 10.82% compared to Manulife Financial Corp.'s net margin of 9.09%. Manulife Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.6% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling downside risk potential of -13.44%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.33 which suggests that it could grow by 1.3%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial Corp., analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than Manulife Financial Corp..

Manulife Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.865%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Manulife Financial Corp. pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Manulife Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, Manulife Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.23x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial Corp. is 1.50x versus 0.42x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica, Inc. has a net margin of 10.82% compared to Manulife Financial Corp.'s net margin of 24.13%. Manulife Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.6% beat Primerica, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.48%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling downside risk potential of -13.44%. On the other hand Primerica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $298.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.65%. Given that Primerica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial Corp., analysts believe Primerica, Inc. is more attractive than Manulife Financial Corp..

Manulife Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica, Inc. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.941%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Primerica, Inc. offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Manulife Financial Corp. pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc. pays out 24.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Primerica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $854.3M. Manulife Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Primerica, Inc.'s net income of $206.1M. Notably, Manulife Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.23x while Primerica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial Corp. is 1.50x versus 2.62x for Primerica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has a net margin of 10.82% compared to Manulife Financial Corp.'s net margin of 4.11%. Manulife Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.6% beat Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.43%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling downside risk potential of -13.44%. On the other hand Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $240.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.06%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial Corp., analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. is more attractive than Manulife Financial Corp..

Manulife Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.451%.

Manulife Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Manulife Financial Corp. pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. pays out 32.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Manulife Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s net income of $255M. Notably, Manulife Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.23x while Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial Corp. is 1.50x versus 0.62x for Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.