RGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 8.97%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $253.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.36%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.798%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.66x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

F&G Annuities & Life has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of -0.44%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 0.37%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $253.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand F&G Annuities & Life has an analysts' consensus of $46.67 which suggests that it could grow by 12.4%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than F&G Annuities & Life, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than F&G Annuities & Life.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. F&G Annuities & Life offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life pays out -174.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is higher than F&G Annuities & Life's net income of -$6M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while F&G Annuities & Life's PE ratio is 16.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.66x versus 0.96x for F&G Annuities & Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of -12.58%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $253.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.09 which suggests that it could grow by 12.36%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.395%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is higher than Lincoln National's net income of -$528M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 22.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.66x versus 0.41x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 21.23%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat Primerica's return on equity of 21.41%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $253.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $309.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.51%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Primerica, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Primerica.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.265% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.951%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $774.1M. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is lower than Primerica's net income of $164.4M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Primerica's PE ratio is 20.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.66x versus 3.05x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.