CNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMERISAFE has a net margin of 1.36% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of 12.32%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 12.2% beat AMERISAFE's return on equity of 16.54%.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $43.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.56%. On the other hand AMERISAFE has an analysts' consensus of $57.67 which suggests that it could grow by 24.26%. Given that AMERISAFE has higher upside potential than CNO Financial Group, analysts believe AMERISAFE is more attractive than CNO Financial Group.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.056%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. AMERISAFE offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE pays out 154.12% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AMERISAFE's is not.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than AMERISAFE quarterly revenues of $72.6M. CNO Financial Group's net income of $13.7M is higher than AMERISAFE's net income of $8.9M. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while AMERISAFE's PE ratio is 18.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.93x versus 2.95x for AMERISAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens Financial has a net margin of 1.36% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of --. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 12.2% beat Citizens Financial's return on equity of --.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $43.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.56%. On the other hand Citizens Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.79%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Citizens Financial, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Citizens Financial.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens Financial has a beta of 0.057, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.271%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Citizens Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Citizens Financial quarterly revenues of --. CNO Financial Group's net income of $13.7M is higher than Citizens Financial's net income of --. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while Citizens Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.93x versus -- for Citizens Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of 1.36% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of 5.22%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 12.2% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 7.43%.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $43.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.56%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $113.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.34%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.503%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 5.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $13.5B. CNO Financial Group's net income of $13.7M is lower than Prudential Financial's net income of $707M. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.93x versus 0.60x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 1.36% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of 5.86%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 12.2% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 14.62%.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $43.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.56%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.23 which suggests that it could grow by 17.29%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than CNO Financial Group, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than CNO Financial Group.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.843%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. CNO Financial Group's net income of $13.7M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $189.1M. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 9.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.93x versus 1.14x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.