JXN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Life has a net margin of -22.41% compared to Jackson Financial's net margin of -18.21%. Jackson Financial's return on equity of -9.19% beat Abacus Life's return on equity of -5.9%.

Jackson Financial has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.29%. On the other hand Abacus Life has an analysts' consensus of $14.38 which suggests that it could grow by 86.21%. Given that Abacus Life has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, analysts believe Abacus Life is more attractive than Jackson Financial.

Jackson Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jackson Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Abacus Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jackson Financial pays 25.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Abacus Life quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Jackson Financial's net income of -$469M is lower than Abacus Life's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Jackson Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.32x while Abacus Life's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial is 1.80x versus 5.13x for Abacus Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -22.41% compared to Jackson Financial's net margin of 8.97%. Jackson Financial's return on equity of -9.19% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86%.

Jackson Financial has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.29%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.76%. Given that Jackson Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Jackson Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Jackson Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.738%.

Jackson Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jackson Financial pays 25.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Jackson Financial's net income of -$469M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M. Notably, Jackson Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.32x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial is 1.80x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of -22.41% compared to Jackson Financial's net margin of 4.52%. Jackson Financial's return on equity of -9.19% beat Citizens's return on equity of 11.99%.

Jackson Financial has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.29%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.74%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Jackson Financial.

Jackson Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.115, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.462%.

Jackson Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jackson Financial pays 25.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Jackson Financial's net income of -$469M is lower than Citizens's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Jackson Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.32x while Citizens's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial is 1.80x versus 0.88x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of -22.41% compared to Jackson Financial's net margin of 4.61%. Jackson Financial's return on equity of -9.19% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98%.

Jackson Financial has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.29%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.54%. Given that Jackson Financial has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Jackson Financial is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Jackson Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.11399999999999%.

Jackson Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jackson Financial pays 25.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Jackson Financial's net income of -$469M is lower than Genworth Financial's net income of $85M. Notably, Jackson Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.32x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 34.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial is 1.80x versus 0.42x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.