JXN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 7.09%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.39%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.2%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, Inc., analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is more attractive than Jackson Financial, Inc..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. pays out 17.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is lower than F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s net income of $120M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.71x while F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.68x versus 0.66x for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.70 which suggests that it could grow by 21.39%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Jackson Financial, Inc..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.234%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is lower than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.71x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.68x versus 1.95x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.1%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than Jackson Financial, Inc..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.41%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is lower than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.71x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 3.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.68x versus 0.37x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TPG, Inc. has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 14.81%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat TPG, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.72%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand TPG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $72.31 which suggests that it could grow by 7.7%. Given that TPG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, Inc., analysts believe TPG, Inc. is more attractive than Jackson Financial, Inc..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. TPG, Inc. offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. TPG, Inc. pays out 826.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but TPG, Inc.'s is not.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than TPG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is lower than TPG, Inc.'s net income of $181.4M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.71x while TPG, Inc.'s PE ratio is 700.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.68x versus 5.85x for TPG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.