JXN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 3.85%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.84%. On the other hand Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.88%. Given that Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, Inc., analysts believe Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is more attractive than Jackson Financial, Inc..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.618%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is higher than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s PE ratio is 23.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.60x versus 1.04x for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 7.09%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.39%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.84%. On the other hand F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.6%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, Inc., analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is more attractive than Jackson Financial, Inc..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. pays out 17.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is lower than F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s net income of $120M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.75x for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.84%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.28%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jackson Financial, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Jackson Financial, Inc..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.927%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is lower than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.60x versus 2.02x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 6.43% compared to Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.84%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.7%. Given that Jackson Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Jackson Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.865%.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M is lower than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, Jackson Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.01x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jackson Financial, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.42x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.