LEVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of 1%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.68%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 29.1%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.26%. Given that Levi Strauss & Co. has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., analysts believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.187%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.1M. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $801K. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.33x versus 0.44x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kontoor Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of 4.33%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.21%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 29.1%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.75 which suggests that it could grow by 47.32%. Given that Kontoor Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss & Co., analysts believe Kontoor Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Levi Strauss & Co..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.74%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Kontoor Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands, Inc. pays out 46.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Kontoor Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $853.1M. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is higher than Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s net income of $36.9M. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.33x versus 1.22x for Kontoor Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of 6.37%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.34%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 29.1%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.24 which suggests that it could grow by 26.22%. Given that Levi Strauss & Co. has higher upside potential than NIKE, Inc., analysts believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more attractive than NIKE, Inc..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is lower than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $792M. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.33x versus 1.94x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PVH Corp. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of 0.18%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat PVH Corp.'s return on equity of 6.87%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $27.21, signalling upside risk potential of 29.1%. On the other hand PVH Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $98.17 which suggests that it could grow by 44.19%. Given that PVH Corp. has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss & Co., analysts believe PVH Corp. is more attractive than Levi Strauss & Co..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PVH Corp. has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.062%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. PVH Corp. offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. PVH Corp. pays out 1.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than PVH Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is higher than PVH Corp.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while PVH Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.33x versus 0.39x for PVH Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.