LEVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of 1.78%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.07%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.37%. On the other hand G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.25 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that Levi Strauss & Co. has higher upside potential than G-III Apparel Group Ltd., analysts believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more attractive than G-III Apparel Group Ltd..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.37%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than G-III Apparel Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $613.3M. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is higher than G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.41x versus 0.43x for G-III Apparel Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of 6.2%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.08%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.37%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.30 which suggests that it could grow by 26.89%. Given that NIKE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss & Co., analysts believe NIKE, Inc. is more attractive than Levi Strauss & Co..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is lower than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $727M. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.41x versus 2.09x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of -38.63%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.37%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 725.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss & Co., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Levi Strauss & Co..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is higher than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.41x versus 0.43x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PVH Corp. has a net margin of 7.91% compared to Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margin of 10.35%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88% beat PVH Corp.'s return on equity of 9.33%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.37%. On the other hand PVH Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that Levi Strauss & Co. has higher upside potential than PVH Corp., analysts believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more attractive than PVH Corp..

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.744% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PVH Corp. has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.062%.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. PVH Corp. offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Levi Strauss & Co. pays 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. PVH Corp. pays out 1.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than PVH Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M is lower than PVH Corp.'s net income of $224.2M. Notably, Levi Strauss & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while PVH Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & Co. is 1.41x versus 0.53x for PVH Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.