LEVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of --. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.46%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.21x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.03x versus 146.44x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of --. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Northann.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.21x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.03x versus 0.69x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PVH has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 6.63%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat PVH's return on equity of 11.6%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand PVH has an analysts' consensus of $95.57 which suggests that it could grow by 36.06%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PVH has a beta of 1.808, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.814%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. PVH offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. PVH pays out 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than PVH quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is lower than PVH's net income of $157.2M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.21x while PVH's PE ratio is 6.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.03x versus 0.46x for PVH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 2.12%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.84, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could grow by 0.78%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Tesla.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.21x while Tesla's PE ratio is 157.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.03x versus 10.52x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.