KWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of -4.88%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.49 which suggests that it could fall by -10.61%. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.215%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.47x versus 0.40x for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Element Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 5.99%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Element Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.44%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Element Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.90 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that Element Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Element Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Element Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.124%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Element Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Element Solutions, Inc. pays out 31.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are smaller than Element Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $656.1M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is lower than Element Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $39.3M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Element Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.47x versus 2.78x for Element Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NewMarket Corp. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 14.47%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat NewMarket Corp.'s return on equity of 29.19%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand NewMarket Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.25%. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than NewMarket Corp., analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than NewMarket Corp..

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NewMarket Corp. has a beta of 0.486, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.411%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. NewMarket Corp. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. NewMarket Corp. pays out 20.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are smaller than NewMarket Corp. quarterly revenues of $690.3M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is lower than NewMarket Corp.'s net income of $99.9M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while NewMarket Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.47x versus 2.23x for NewMarket Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingevity Corp. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 12.25%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Ingevity Corp.'s return on equity of -37.98%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Ingevity Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.09%. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than Ingevity Corp., analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Ingevity Corp..

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity Corp. has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.759%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Ingevity Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are larger than Ingevity Corp. quarterly revenues of $333.2M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is lower than Ingevity Corp.'s net income of $40.8M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Ingevity Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.47x versus 1.99x for Ingevity Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.