KWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of -29.28%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Minerals Technologies's return on equity of -1.38%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $149.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.01%. On the other hand Minerals Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $82.50 which suggests that it could grow by 55.63%. Given that Minerals Technologies has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Minerals Technologies is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.189%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Minerals Technologies offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are smaller than Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues of $491.8M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is higher than Minerals Technologies's net income of -$144M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Minerals Technologies's PE ratio is 10.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.02x versus 0.82x for Minerals Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingevity has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 5.56%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $149.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.01%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $49.75 which suggests that it could grow by 41.98%. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Ingevity.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.549%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $298.8M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is lower than Ingevity's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.02x versus 0.91x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of -3.84%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $149.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.01%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 123.71%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.222%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Rayonier Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of $422.5M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Rayonier Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.02x versus 0.18x for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of --. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $149.00, signalling upside risk potential of 49.01%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 139.27%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.59x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.02x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.