KWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 1.68%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $166.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.83%. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.334, which suggesting that the stock is 33.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.528%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 38.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.27x versus 1.20x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of --. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $166.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 46.55%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.334, which suggesting that the stock is 33.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.27x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of --. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $166.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.334, which suggesting that the stock is 33.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.27x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.