KWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of -5.4%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.41 which suggests that it could grow by 30.59%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.925%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.64x versus 0.28x for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Element Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.92%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Element Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.38%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Element Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.60 which suggests that it could grow by 3.1%. Given that Element Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Element Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Element Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.280, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.956%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Element Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Element Solutions, Inc. pays out 40.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are smaller than Element Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $676.2M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is higher than Element Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $6.2M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Element Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 45.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.64x versus 3.37x for Element Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NewMarket Corp. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 12.74%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat NewMarket Corp.'s return on equity of 25.87%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand NewMarket Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that NewMarket Corp. has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe NewMarket Corp. is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NewMarket Corp. has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.831%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. NewMarket Corp. offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. NewMarket Corp. pays out 25.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are smaller than NewMarket Corp. quarterly revenues of $635.4M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is lower than NewMarket Corp.'s net income of $81M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while NewMarket Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.64x versus 2.09x for NewMarket Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingevity Corp. has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 12.25%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of -0.65% beat Ingevity Corp.'s return on equity of -37.98%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $172.25, signalling downside risk potential of -0.98%. On the other hand Ingevity Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $70.75 which suggests that it could fall by -2.44%. Given that Ingevity Corp. has more downside risk than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Ingevity Corp..

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity Corp. has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.774%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Ingevity Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $493.8M, which are larger than Ingevity Corp. quarterly revenues of $333.2M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $30.5M is lower than Ingevity Corp.'s net income of $40.8M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.73x while Ingevity Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.64x versus 2.08x for Ingevity Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.