NGVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ashland has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Ingevity's net margin of -40.74%. Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59% beat Ashland's return on equity of -0.79%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $58.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand Ashland has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.96%. Given that Ashland has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Ashland is more attractive than Ingevity.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ashland has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.638%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ashland offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland pays out 46.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $298.8M, which are smaller than Ashland quarterly revenues of $405M. Ingevity's net income of $16.6M is higher than Ashland's net income of -$165M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ashland's PE ratio is 21.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.14x versus 1.37x for Ashland. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hecla Mining has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Ingevity's net margin of 4.78%. Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59% beat Hecla Mining's return on equity of 1.79%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $58.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand Hecla Mining has an analysts' consensus of $7.42 which suggests that it could grow by 29.21%. Given that Ingevity has higher upside potential than Hecla Mining, analysts believe Ingevity is more attractive than Hecla Mining.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hecla Mining has a beta of 1.935, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.538%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hecla Mining offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hecla Mining pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Hecla Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $298.8M, which are larger than Hecla Mining quarterly revenues of $249.7M. Ingevity's net income of $16.6M is higher than Hecla Mining's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hecla Mining's PE ratio is 109.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.14x versus 3.85x for Hecla Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ArcelorMittal SA has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Ingevity's net margin of -2.65%. Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59% beat ArcelorMittal SA's return on equity of 2.46%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $58.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand ArcelorMittal SA has an analysts' consensus of $31.56 which suggests that it could fall by -2.05%. Given that Ingevity has higher upside potential than ArcelorMittal SA, analysts believe Ingevity is more attractive than ArcelorMittal SA.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ArcelorMittal SA has a beta of 1.795, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.465%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ArcelorMittal SA offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ArcelorMittal SA pays out 29.35% of its earnings as a dividend. ArcelorMittal SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $298.8M, which are smaller than ArcelorMittal SA quarterly revenues of $14.7B. Ingevity's net income of $16.6M is higher than ArcelorMittal SA's net income of -$390M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ArcelorMittal SA's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.14x versus 0.41x for ArcelorMittal SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Ingevity's net margin of 5.35%. Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $58.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.6%. Given that Ingevity has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Ingevity is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.526, which suggesting that the stock is 52.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $298.8M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Ingevity's net income of $16.6M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.14x versus 1.13x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.