ESI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mativ Holdings has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Element Solutions's net margin of -87.77%. Element Solutions's return on equity of 11.81% beat Mativ Holdings's return on equity of -56.14%.

Element Solutions has a consensus price target of $27.42, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand Mativ Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 137.23%. Given that Mativ Holdings has higher upside potential than Element Solutions, analysts believe Mativ Holdings is more attractive than Element Solutions.

Element Solutions has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mativ Holdings has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.621%.

Element Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Mativ Holdings offers a yield of 7.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Element Solutions pays 32.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings pays out -44.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Element Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Solutions quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are larger than Mativ Holdings quarterly revenues of $484.8M. Element Solutions's net income of $98M is higher than Mativ Holdings's net income of -$425.5M. Notably, Element Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Mativ Holdings's PE ratio is 4.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Solutions is 2.09x versus 0.15x for Mativ Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Element Solutions's net margin of -29.28%. Element Solutions's return on equity of 11.81% beat Minerals Technologies's return on equity of -1.38%.

Element Solutions has a consensus price target of $27.42, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand Minerals Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $82.50 which suggests that it could grow by 49.46%. Given that Minerals Technologies has higher upside potential than Element Solutions, analysts believe Minerals Technologies is more attractive than Element Solutions.

Element Solutions has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.189%.

Element Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Minerals Technologies offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Element Solutions pays 32.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Solutions quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are larger than Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues of $491.8M. Element Solutions's net income of $98M is higher than Minerals Technologies's net income of -$144M. Notably, Element Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Minerals Technologies's PE ratio is 10.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Solutions is 2.09x versus 0.85x for Minerals Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Element Solutions's net margin of --. Element Solutions's return on equity of 11.81% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Element Solutions has a consensus price target of $27.42, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 198.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Element Solutions, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Element Solutions.

Element Solutions has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

Element Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Element Solutions pays 32.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Element Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Solutions quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Element Solutions's net income of $98M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Element Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Solutions is 2.09x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 16.51% compared to Element Solutions's net margin of --. Element Solutions's return on equity of 11.81% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Element Solutions has a consensus price target of $27.42, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 146.91%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Element Solutions, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Element Solutions.

Element Solutions has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Element Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Element Solutions pays 32.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Element Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Element Solutions quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Element Solutions's net income of $98M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Element Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Element Solutions is 2.09x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.