HUBB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Illinois Tool Works Inc. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of 20.23%. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s return on equity of 92.42%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $478.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.36%. On the other hand Illinois Tool Works Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $260.72 which suggests that it could grow by 4.55%. Given that Hubbell, Inc. has higher upside potential than Illinois Tool Works Inc., analysts believe Hubbell, Inc. is more attractive than Illinois Tool Works Inc..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.583% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illinois Tool Works Inc. has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.01%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Illinois Tool Works Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.61 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Illinois Tool Works Inc. pays out 49.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Illinois Tool Works Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is lower than Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s net income of $821M. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.13x versus 4.61x for Illinois Tool Works Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of 2.76%. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $478.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.36%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.75 which suggests that it could grow by 11.98%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.583% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.146, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.638%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Kimball Electronics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.6M. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is higher than Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.13x versus 0.50x for Kimball Electronics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International Corp. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of -15.13%. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Orbit International Corp.'s return on equity of -28.79%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $478.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.36%. On the other hand Orbit International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.39%. Given that Orbit International Corp. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Orbit International Corp. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.583% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International Corp. has a beta of 0.097, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.295%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Orbit International Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp. pays out 10.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Orbit International Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is higher than Orbit International Corp.'s net income of -$875K. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while Orbit International Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.13x versus 0.53x for Orbit International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otis Worldwide Corp. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of 10.62%. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Otis Worldwide Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $478.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.36%. On the other hand Otis Worldwide Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $103.25 which suggests that it could grow by 18.8%. Given that Otis Worldwide Corp. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Otis Worldwide Corp. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.583% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otis Worldwide Corp. has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.193%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Otis Worldwide Corp. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Otis Worldwide Corp. pays out 37.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Otis Worldwide Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is lower than Otis Worldwide Corp.'s net income of $392M. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while Otis Worldwide Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.13x versus 2.41x for Otis Worldwide Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.