HUBB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Generation Alpha, Inc. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Generation Alpha, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $502.23, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Generation Alpha, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 281150%. Given that Generation Alpha, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Generation Alpha, Inc. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generation Alpha, Inc. has a beta of 72.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7111.256%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Generation Alpha, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Generation Alpha, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Generation Alpha, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is higher than Generation Alpha, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while Generation Alpha, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.61x versus 0.08x for Generation Alpha, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of 2.76%. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $502.23, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.24%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.31%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Kimball Electronics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.6M. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is higher than Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.61x versus 0.51x for Kimball Electronics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International Corp. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of -15.13%. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Orbit International Corp.'s return on equity of -28.79%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $502.23, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Orbit International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.67%. Given that Hubbell, Inc. has higher upside potential than Orbit International Corp., analysts believe Hubbell, Inc. is more attractive than Orbit International Corp..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International Corp. has a beta of 0.089, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.06%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Orbit International Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp. pays out 10.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Orbit International Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is higher than Orbit International Corp.'s net income of -$875K. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while Orbit International Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.61x versus 0.74x for Orbit International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vertiv Holdings Co. has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Hubbell, Inc.'s net margin of 14.89%. Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62% beat Vertiv Holdings Co.'s return on equity of 38.17%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a consensus price target of $502.23, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Vertiv Holdings Co. has an analysts' consensus of $200.16 which suggests that it could grow by 7.51%. Given that Vertiv Holdings Co. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Vertiv Holdings Co. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vertiv Holdings Co. has a beta of 2.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.401%.

Hubbell, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Vertiv Holdings Co. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Hubbell, Inc. pays 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings Co. pays out 8.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Vertiv Holdings Co. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M is lower than Vertiv Holdings Co.'s net income of $398.5M. Notably, Hubbell, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while Vertiv Holdings Co.'s PE ratio is 70.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell, Inc. is 4.61x versus 7.48x for Vertiv Holdings Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.