KE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Hayward Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.93 which suggests that it could grow by 9.55%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Hayward Holdings, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hayward Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244.3M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is lower than Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.86x while Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.50x versus 3.26x for Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hubbell, Inc. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 17.06%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Hubbell, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $478.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.36%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.583%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hubbell, Inc. offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc. pays out 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are smaller than Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is lower than Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.86x while Hubbell, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.50x versus 4.13x for Hubbell, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International Corp. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of -15.13%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Orbit International Corp.'s return on equity of -28.79%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Orbit International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.39%. Given that Orbit International Corp. has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, Inc., analysts believe Orbit International Corp. is more attractive than Kimball Electronics, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International Corp. has a beta of 0.097, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.295%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orbit International Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp. pays out 10.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than Orbit International Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than Orbit International Corp.'s net income of -$875K. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.86x while Orbit International Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.50x versus 0.53x for Orbit International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries Ltd. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.98%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat RF Industries Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.98%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand RF Industries Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.25 which suggests that it could grow by 53.15%. Given that RF Industries Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, Inc., analysts believe RF Industries Ltd. is more attractive than Kimball Electronics, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries Ltd. has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.951%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Industries Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than RF Industries Ltd. quarterly revenues of $19.8M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than RF Industries Ltd.'s net income of $392K. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.86x while RF Industries Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.50x versus 0.84x for RF Industries Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.