KE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hubbell has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of 14.76%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat Hubbell's return on equity of 25.24%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Hubbell has an analysts' consensus of $448.94 which suggests that it could grow by 33.46%. Given that Hubbell has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, analysts believe Hubbell is more attractive than Kimball Electronics.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.523%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hubbell offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are smaller than Hubbell quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is lower than Hubbell's net income of $197M. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.13x while Hubbell's PE ratio is 23.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.27x versus 3.23x for Hubbell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of --. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.42%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Orbit International, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Orbit International.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.863%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orbit International offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.13x while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.27x versus 0.75x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of -1.28%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat RF Industries's return on equity of -15.6%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand RF Industries has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.05%. Given that RF Industries has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, analysts believe RF Industries is more attractive than Kimball Electronics.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.316%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are larger than RF Industries quarterly revenues of $19.2M. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is higher than RF Industries's net income of -$245K. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.13x while RF Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.27x versus 0.66x for RF Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thermon Group Holdings has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of 13.8%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 1.49% beat Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 9.73%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Thermon Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.73%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Thermon Group Holdings, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Thermon Group Holdings.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.045%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thermon Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thermon Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $357.4M, which are larger than Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $134.4M. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.4M is lower than Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $18.5M. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.13x while Thermon Group Holdings's PE ratio is 21.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.27x versus 2.05x for Thermon Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.