KE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 23.86%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp.'s return on equity of 18.51%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.02%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp. has a beta of 0.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.932%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp. offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp. pays out 33.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.1M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.69x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.48x versus 3.07x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hubbell, Inc. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 17.06%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand Hubbell, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $497.15 which suggests that it could grow by 5.66%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.154%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hubbell, Inc. offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc. pays out 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are smaller than Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is lower than Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.69x while Hubbell, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.48x versus 4.44x for Hubbell, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International Corp. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of -15.13%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Orbit International Corp.'s return on equity of -28.79%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand Orbit International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Orbit International Corp., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Orbit International Corp..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International Corp. has a beta of 0.089, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.06%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orbit International Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp. pays out 10.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than Orbit International Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than Orbit International Corp.'s net income of -$875K. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.69x while Orbit International Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.48x versus 0.55x for Orbit International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries Ltd. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.98%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat RF Industries Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.98%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.4%. On the other hand RF Industries Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.25 which suggests that it could grow by 58.39%. Given that RF Industries Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, Inc., analysts believe RF Industries Ltd. is more attractive than Kimball Electronics, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries Ltd. has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.91%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Industries Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than RF Industries Ltd. quarterly revenues of $19.8M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than RF Industries Ltd.'s net income of $392K. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.69x while RF Industries Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.48x versus 0.81x for RF Industries Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.