KE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Generation Alpha, Inc. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Generation Alpha, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Generation Alpha, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 281150%. Given that Generation Alpha, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, Inc., analysts believe Generation Alpha, Inc. is more attractive than Kimball Electronics, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generation Alpha, Inc. has a beta of 72.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7111.256%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Generation Alpha, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Generation Alpha, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than Generation Alpha, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than Generation Alpha, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.63x while Generation Alpha, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.51x versus 0.08x for Generation Alpha, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hubbell, Inc. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 17.06%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Hubbell, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.62%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Hubbell, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $502.23 which suggests that it could grow by 2.93%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hubbell, Inc., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Hubbell, Inc..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.154%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hubbell, Inc. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc. pays out 34.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are smaller than Hubbell, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is lower than Hubbell, Inc.'s net income of $256.3M. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.63x while Hubbell, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.51x versus 4.61x for Hubbell, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International Corp. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of -15.13%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat Orbit International Corp.'s return on equity of -28.79%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Orbit International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.67%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Orbit International Corp., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than Orbit International Corp..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International Corp. has a beta of 0.089, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.06%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orbit International Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp. pays out 10.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than Orbit International Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than Orbit International Corp.'s net income of -$875K. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.63x while Orbit International Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.51x versus 0.74x for Orbit International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries Ltd. has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net margin of 0.76%. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.3% beat RF Industries Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.22%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand RF Industries Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.25 which suggests that it could grow by 5.02%. Given that Kimball Electronics, Inc. has higher upside potential than RF Industries Ltd., analysts believe Kimball Electronics, Inc. is more attractive than RF Industries Ltd..

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries Ltd. has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.91%.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Industries Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.6M, which are larger than RF Industries Ltd. quarterly revenues of $22.7M. Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s net income of $10.1M is higher than RF Industries Ltd.'s net income of $173K. Notably, Kimball Electronics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.63x while RF Industries Ltd.'s PE ratio is 1,626.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics, Inc. is 0.51x versus 1.30x for RF Industries Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.