GOOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EV Technology Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Canada Goose Holdings's net margin of --. Canada Goose Holdings's return on equity of 16.69% beat EV Technology Group's return on equity of --.

Canada Goose Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -1.2%. On the other hand EV Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canada Goose Holdings has higher upside potential than EV Technology Group, analysts believe Canada Goose Holdings is more attractive than EV Technology Group.

Canada Goose Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EV Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Canada Goose Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EV Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canada Goose Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EV Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Canada Goose Holdings quarterly revenues are $196.2M, which are larger than EV Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Canada Goose Holdings's net income of $4M is higher than EV Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Canada Goose Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while EV Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canada Goose Holdings is 1.01x versus -- for EV Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Canada Goose Holdings's net margin of 15.98%. Canada Goose Holdings's return on equity of 16.69% beat Summit Networks's return on equity of -40.17%.

Canada Goose Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -1.2%. On the other hand Summit Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canada Goose Holdings has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, analysts believe Canada Goose Holdings is more attractive than Summit Networks.

Canada Goose Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks has a beta of 7.458, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 645.777%.

Canada Goose Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Summit Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canada Goose Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Canada Goose Holdings quarterly revenues are $196.2M, which are larger than Summit Networks quarterly revenues of -$73.9K. Canada Goose Holdings's net income of $4M is higher than Summit Networks's net income of -$11.8K. Notably, Canada Goose Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Summit Networks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canada Goose Holdings is 1.01x versus -- for Summit Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiga Motors has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Canada Goose Holdings's net margin of -283.27%. Canada Goose Holdings's return on equity of 16.69% beat Taiga Motors's return on equity of -351%.

Canada Goose Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -1.2%. On the other hand Taiga Motors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canada Goose Holdings has higher upside potential than Taiga Motors, analysts believe Canada Goose Holdings is more attractive than Taiga Motors.

Canada Goose Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiga Motors has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Canada Goose Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taiga Motors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canada Goose Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taiga Motors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Canada Goose Holdings quarterly revenues are $196.2M, which are larger than Taiga Motors quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Canada Goose Holdings's net income of $4M is higher than Taiga Motors's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Canada Goose Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Taiga Motors's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canada Goose Holdings is 1.01x versus 0.49x for Taiga Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Canada Goose Holdings's net margin of -358.39%. Canada Goose Holdings's return on equity of 16.69% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -181.67%.

Canada Goose Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -1.2%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $234.56 which suggests that it could grow by 16796.95%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Canada Goose Holdings, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Canada Goose Holdings.

Canada Goose Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.547% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Canada Goose Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canada Goose Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Canada Goose Holdings quarterly revenues are $196.2M, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $743.9K. Canada Goose Holdings's net income of $4M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Canada Goose Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canada Goose Holdings is 1.01x versus 0.06x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.