GBTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a net margin of -9.2% compared to Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.27%. On the other hand Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc., analysts believe Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is more attractive than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc..

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.735, which suggesting that the stock is 26.474% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a beta of 2.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.563%.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $674M, which are larger than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net income of -$62M is higher than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 344.00x while Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is 1.47x versus -- for Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of -9.2% compared to Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net margin of 21.85%. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 56.21%.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.27%. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $273.50 which suggests that it could fall by -4.56%. Given that Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, Inc., analysts believe Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is more attractive than Expedia Group, Inc..

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.735, which suggesting that the stock is 26.474% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.941%.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $674M, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net income of -$62M is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $964M. Notably, Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 344.00x while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is 1.47x versus 2.63x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato, Inc. has a net margin of -9.2% compared to Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net margin of -8.14%. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat Inspirato, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.27%. On the other hand Inspirato, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 164.42%. Given that Inspirato, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Business Travel Group, Inc., analysts believe Inspirato, Inc. is more attractive than Global Business Travel Group, Inc..

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.735, which suggesting that the stock is 26.474% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $674M, which are larger than Inspirato, Inc. quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net income of -$62M is lower than Inspirato, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 344.00x while Inspirato, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is 1.47x versus 0.21x for Inspirato, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -9.2% compared to Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net margin of 1.9%. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.86, signalling upside risk potential of 40.27%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.77%. Given that Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc..

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.735, which suggesting that the stock is 26.474% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.382%.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $674M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $240.2M. Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net income of -$62M is lower than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M. Notably, Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 344.00x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is 1.47x versus 1.09x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.