CDNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net margin of 21.85%. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 56.21%.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $269.79 which suggests that it could grow by 2.81%. Given that Expedia Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc., analysts believe Expedia Group, Inc. is more attractive than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc..

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.941%.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $964M. Notably, Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. is -- versus 2.41x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net margin of -9.2%. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16%.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.86 which suggests that it could grow by 35.71%. Given that Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc., analysts believe Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is more attractive than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc..

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.474%.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Business Travel Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $674M. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net income of -$62M. Notably, Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 355.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. is -- versus 1.52x for Global Business Travel Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net margin of -8.14%. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Inspirato, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inspirato, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 292.86%. Given that Inspirato, Inc. has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc., analysts believe Inspirato, Inc. is more attractive than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc..

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inspirato, Inc. quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Inspirato, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. is -- versus 0.14x for Inspirato, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net margin of 1.9%. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc., analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc..

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.382%.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $240.2M. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M. Notably, Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. is -- versus 0.89x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.