LIND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc., analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc..

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.364, which suggesting that the stock is 136.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. has a beta of 2.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.563%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $240.2M, which are larger than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus -- for Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 21.85%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 56.21%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $273.50 which suggests that it could fall by -4.56%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, Inc., analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Expedia Group, Inc..

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.364, which suggesting that the stock is 136.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.941%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $240.2M, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $964M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus 2.63x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -9.2%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.86 which suggests that it could grow by 40.27%. Given that Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Global Business Travel Group, Inc. is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc..

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.364, which suggesting that the stock is 136.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Business Travel Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.474%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Business Travel Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $240.2M, which are smaller than Global Business Travel Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $674M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s net income of -$62M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 344.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus 1.47x for Global Business Travel Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato, Inc. has a net margin of 1.9% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -8.14%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Inspirato, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Inspirato, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 164.42%. Given that Inspirato, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Inspirato, Inc. is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc..

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.364, which suggesting that the stock is 136.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $240.2M, which are larger than Inspirato, Inc. quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Inspirato, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus 0.21x for Inspirato, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.