LIND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of -16.86% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 9.39%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 60.9%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $212.54 which suggests that it could grow by 26.44%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.122, which suggesting that the stock is 212.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.749%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.6M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 18.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.83x versus 1.67x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Business Travel Group has a net margin of -16.86% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of -2.71%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -11.97%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 60.9%. On the other hand Global Business Travel Group has an analysts' consensus of $10.43 which suggests that it could grow by 41.69%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Global Business Travel Group, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Global Business Travel Group.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.122, which suggesting that the stock is 212.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Business Travel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Business Travel Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.6M, which are smaller than Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues of $591M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M is lower than Global Business Travel Group's net income of -$16M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Business Travel Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.83x versus 1.41x for Global Business Travel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of -16.86% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of -3.62%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 60.9%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 148.87%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.122, which suggesting that the stock is 212.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.6M, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $63.1M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M is lower than Inspirato's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.83x versus 0.11x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vacasa has a net margin of -16.86% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of -30.52%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 60.9%. On the other hand Vacasa has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could fall by -53.53%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Vacasa.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.122, which suggesting that the stock is 212.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vacasa offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vacasa pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.6M, which are larger than Vacasa quarterly revenues of $138M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M is higher than Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vacasa's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 0.83x versus 0.09x for Vacasa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.