ABNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Airbnb's net margin of 19.52%. Airbnb's return on equity of 32.32% beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Airbnb has a consensus price target of $150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,459.52 which suggests that it could grow by 19.38%. Given that Airbnb has higher upside potential than Booking Holdings, analysts believe Airbnb is more attractive than Booking Holdings.

Airbnb has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.823%.

Airbnb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $9.60 per share. Airbnb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbnb quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Airbnb's net income of $461M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Airbnb's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.29x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 26.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbnb is 6.55x versus 6.56x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Airbnb's net margin of 9.39%. Airbnb's return on equity of 32.32% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Airbnb has a consensus price target of $150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $205.22 which suggests that it could grow by 35.77%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Airbnb, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Airbnb.

Airbnb has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.349%.

Airbnb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Airbnb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Airbnb quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Airbnb's net income of $461M is higher than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Airbnb's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.29x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbnb is 6.55x versus 1.50x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Airbnb's net margin of -16.86%. Airbnb's return on equity of 32.32% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Airbnb has a consensus price target of $150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 92.15%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Airbnb, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Airbnb.

Airbnb has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.867, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.735%.

Airbnb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Airbnb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Airbnb quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.6M. Airbnb's net income of $461M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M. Notably, Airbnb's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.29x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbnb is 6.55x versus 0.69x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vacasa has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Airbnb's net margin of -30.52%. Airbnb's return on equity of 32.32% beat Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12%.

Airbnb has a consensus price target of $150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand Vacasa has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could fall by -53.88%. Given that Airbnb has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Airbnb is more attractive than Vacasa.

Airbnb has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Airbnb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vacasa offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Airbnb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vacasa pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Airbnb quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Vacasa quarterly revenues of $138M. Airbnb's net income of $461M is higher than Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M. Notably, Airbnb's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.29x while Vacasa's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbnb is 6.55x versus 0.10x for Vacasa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.