FIGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of 12.16%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.81, signalling downside risk potential of -12.68%. On the other hand Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $238.29 which suggests that it could grow by 22.45%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.17%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $705.6M. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is lower than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.08x while Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.36x versus 2.76x for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gap, Inc. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of 5.99%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat Gap, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.33%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.81, signalling downside risk potential of -12.68%. On the other hand Gap, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.42 which suggests that it could grow by 5.73%. Given that Gap, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Gap, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gap, Inc. has a beta of 2.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.365%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gap, Inc. offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap, Inc. pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Gap, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than Gap, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is lower than Gap, Inc.'s net income of $236M. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.08x while Gap, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.36x versus 0.72x for Gap, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.81, signalling downside risk potential of -12.68%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.67 which suggests that it could grow by 74.52%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.622%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.08x while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.36x versus 14.55x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.81, signalling downside risk potential of -12.68%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.41%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.08x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 382.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.36x versus 15.31x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.