FIGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of 8.35%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling downside risk potential of -18.82%. On the other hand Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $227.14 which suggests that it could grow by 15.9%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.647%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $505.4M. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is lower than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 117.20x while Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.48x versus 2.91x for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fossil Group, Inc. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of -14.82%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling downside risk potential of -18.82%. On the other hand Fossil Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.87%. Given that Fossil Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Fossil Group, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.611, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.055%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fossil Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fossil Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $270.2M. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is higher than Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 117.20x while Fossil Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.48x versus 0.18x for Fossil Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of 8.15%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.7%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling downside risk potential of -18.82%. On the other hand G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $33.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.58%. Given that G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe G-III Apparel Group Ltd. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.618%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than G-III Apparel Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $988.6M. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is lower than G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s net income of $80.6M. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 117.20x while G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.48x versus 0.44x for G-III Apparel Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 5.77% compared to FIGS, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

FIGS, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.46, signalling downside risk potential of -18.82%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $401.40 which suggests that it could fall by -7.29%. Given that FIGS, Inc. has more downside risk than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.075%.

FIGS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues are $151.7M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, FIGS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 117.20x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 289.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS, Inc. is 3.48x versus 15.94x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.