FIGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 1.24% compared to FIGS's net margin of 2.26%. FIGS's return on equity of 0.7% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 16.43%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that FIGS has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe FIGS is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.878%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $151.8M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. FIGS's net income of $1.9M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.50x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.36x versus 0.46x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 1.24% compared to FIGS's net margin of --. FIGS's return on equity of 0.7% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 16.43%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.93%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than FIGS.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $151.8M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. FIGS's net income of $1.9M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.50x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.36x versus 131.07x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 1.24% compared to FIGS's net margin of --. FIGS's return on equity of 0.7% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 16.43%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FIGS has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe FIGS is more attractive than Northann.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $151.8M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. FIGS's net income of $1.9M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.50x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.36x versus 0.38x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 1.24% compared to FIGS's net margin of -42.85%. FIGS's return on equity of 0.7% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 16.43%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 21.38%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than FIGS.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $151.8M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. FIGS's net income of $1.9M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 213.50x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.36x versus 2.43x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.