BOOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chewy, Inc. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.9%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Chewy, Inc.'s return on equity of 60.01%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand Chewy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.57 which suggests that it could grow by 40.26%. Given that Chewy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Chewy, Inc. is more attractive than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chewy, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.427%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chewy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chewy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Chewy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is lower than Chewy, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.51x while Chewy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 67.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.76x versus 1.10x for Chewy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FIGS, Inc. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.77%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand FIGS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.17 which suggests that it could fall by -22.34%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FIGS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FIGS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are larger than FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $151.7M. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is higher than FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.51x while FIGS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 118.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.76x versus 3.53x for FIGS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.97%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 46.58%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.15 which suggests that it could grow by 22.88%. Given that Tractor Supply Co. has higher upside potential than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Tractor Supply Co. is more attractive than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.659%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 43.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is lower than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $259.3M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.51x while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 24.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.76x versus 1.78x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters, Inc. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.61%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Urban Outfitters, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.5%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 22.13%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $84.58 which suggests that it could grow by 9.78%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Urban Outfitters, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters, Inc. has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.022%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is lower than Urban Outfitters, Inc.'s net income of $116.4M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.51x while Urban Outfitters, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.76x versus 1.19x for Urban Outfitters, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.