BOOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 24.63%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s return on equity of 40.98%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $238.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $128.52 which suggests that it could grow by 8.29%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Deckers Outdoor Corp., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Deckers Outdoor Corp..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.672, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.857%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deckers Outdoor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are smaller than Deckers Outdoor Corp. quarterly revenues of $2B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is lower than Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s net income of $481.1M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.83x versus 3.28x for Deckers Outdoor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FIGS, Inc. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.77%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $238.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand FIGS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.81 which suggests that it could fall by -12.68%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.672, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FIGS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FIGS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are larger than FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $151.7M. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is higher than FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while FIGS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 113.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.83x versus 3.36x for FIGS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gap, Inc. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.99%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat Gap, Inc.'s return on equity of 25.33%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $238.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand Gap, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.42 which suggests that it could grow by 5.73%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gap, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Gap, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.672, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gap, Inc. has a beta of 2.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.365%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gap, Inc. offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap, Inc. pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Gap, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are smaller than Gap, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is lower than Gap, Inc.'s net income of $236M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Gap, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.83x versus 0.72x for Gap, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & Co. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -2.11%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat Victoria's Secret & Co.'s return on equity of 28.84%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $238.29, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $62.67 which suggests that it could fall by -2.65%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret & Co., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria's Secret & Co..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.672, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & Co. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria's Secret & Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are smaller than Victoria's Secret & Co. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is higher than Victoria's Secret & Co.'s net income of -$31M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Victoria's Secret & Co.'s PE ratio is 31.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.83x versus 0.82x for Victoria's Secret & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.