BOOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chewy, Inc. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.9%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Chewy, Inc.'s return on equity of 60.01%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand Chewy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.57 which suggests that it could grow by 42.63%. Given that Chewy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Chewy, Inc. is more attractive than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chewy, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.427%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chewy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chewy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Chewy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is lower than Chewy, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Chewy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.81x versus 1.08x for Chewy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.81%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.06%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $237.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.97%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.591%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. pays out 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.'s net income of $75.2M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.81x versus 1.17x for Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FIGS, Inc. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.77%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.47%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand FIGS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.17 which suggests that it could fall by -22.73%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FIGS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FIGS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are larger than FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $151.7M. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is higher than FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while FIGS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 119.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.81x versus 3.55x for FIGS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.97%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.54% beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 46.58%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $227.14, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.15 which suggests that it could grow by 22.26%. Given that Tractor Supply Co. has higher upside potential than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Tractor Supply Co. is more attractive than Boot Barn Holdings, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.659%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 43.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $42.2M is lower than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $259.3M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 24.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.81x versus 1.79x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.