EXP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 18.51% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -0.58%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 3.2%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $222.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.05%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.68%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Eagle Materials, Inc., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Eagle Materials, Inc..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.348, which suggesting that the stock is 34.822% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.713%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $556M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $633.7M. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $102.9M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 133.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.04x versus 2.04x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CRH Plc has a net margin of 18.51% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 11.01%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat CRH Plc's return on equity of 15.93%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $222.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.05%. On the other hand CRH Plc has an analysts' consensus of $142.13 which suggests that it could grow by 25.17%. Given that CRH Plc has higher upside potential than Eagle Materials, Inc., analysts believe CRH Plc is more attractive than Eagle Materials, Inc..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.348, which suggesting that the stock is 34.822% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRH Plc has a beta of 1.342, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.242%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. CRH Plc offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. CRH Plc pays out 27.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $556M, which are smaller than CRH Plc quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $102.9M is lower than CRH Plc's net income of $1B. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while CRH Plc's PE ratio is 20.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.04x versus 2.05x for CRH Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 18.51% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 3.04%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $222.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.05%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $124.50 which suggests that it could fall by -6.09%. Given that Eagle Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Eagle Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.348, which suggesting that the stock is 34.822% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.887%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 45.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $556M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $929M. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $102.9M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $28.2M. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.04x versus 0.65x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Monarch Cement Co. has a net margin of 18.51% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 34.41%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat The Monarch Cement Co.'s return on equity of 14.27%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $222.55, signalling upside risk potential of 4.05%. On the other hand The Monarch Cement Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eagle Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Monarch Cement Co., analysts believe Eagle Materials, Inc. is more attractive than The Monarch Cement Co..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.348, which suggesting that the stock is 34.822% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Monarch Cement Co. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.955%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. The Monarch Cement Co. offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. The Monarch Cement Co. pays out 16.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $556M, which are larger than The Monarch Cement Co. quarterly revenues of $73M. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $102.9M is higher than The Monarch Cement Co.'s net income of $25.1M. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while The Monarch Cement Co.'s PE ratio is 16.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.04x versus 3.98x for The Monarch Cement Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.