EXP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CRH Plc has a net margin of 21.5% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 13.72%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.14% beat CRH Plc's return on equity of 14.84%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $243.90, signalling upside risk potential of 8.88%. On the other hand CRH Plc has an analysts' consensus of $134.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.07%. Given that CRH Plc has higher upside potential than Eagle Materials, Inc., analysts believe CRH Plc is more attractive than Eagle Materials, Inc..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRH Plc has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.599%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. CRH Plc offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. CRH Plc pays out 28.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $638.9M, which are smaller than CRH Plc quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $137.4M is lower than CRH Plc's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.54x while CRH Plc's PE ratio is 24.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.22x versus 2.23x for CRH Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Monarch Cement Co. has a net margin of 21.5% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 27.61%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.14% beat The Monarch Cement Co.'s return on equity of 15.13%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $243.90, signalling upside risk potential of 8.88%. On the other hand The Monarch Cement Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eagle Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Monarch Cement Co., analysts believe Eagle Materials, Inc. is more attractive than The Monarch Cement Co..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Monarch Cement Co. has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.579%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. The Monarch Cement Co. offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. The Monarch Cement Co. pays out 16.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $638.9M, which are larger than The Monarch Cement Co. quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $137.4M is higher than The Monarch Cement Co.'s net income of $18.7M. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.54x while The Monarch Cement Co.'s PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.22x versus 3.19x for The Monarch Cement Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 21.5% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 19.56%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.14% beat Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.74%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $243.90, signalling upside risk potential of 8.88%. On the other hand Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $668.38 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that Eagle Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., analysts believe Eagle Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials, Inc..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.919%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. pays out 9.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $638.9M, which are smaller than Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $137.4M is lower than Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s net income of $361M. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.54x while Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.22x versus 5.64x for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a net margin of 21.5% compared to Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net margin of 13.41%. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.14% beat Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of $243.90, signalling upside risk potential of 8.88%. On the other hand Smith-Midland Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eagle Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Eagle Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.809, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.934%.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Smith-Midland Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith-Midland Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $638.9M, which are larger than Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues of $21.5M. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $137.4M is higher than Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M. Notably, Eagle Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.54x while Smith-Midland Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eagle Materials, Inc. is 3.22x versus 2.13x for Smith-Midland Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.