ENVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Bankers has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Enova International's net margin of --. Enova International's return on equity of 15.1% beat Community Bankers's return on equity of --.

Enova International has a consensus price target of $108.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.49%. On the other hand Community Bankers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enova International has higher upside potential than Community Bankers, analysts believe Enova International is more attractive than Community Bankers.

Enova International has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Bankers has a beta of -0.467, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.666%.

Enova International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Community Bankers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Enova International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Community Bankers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enova International quarterly revenues are $689.9M, which are larger than Community Bankers quarterly revenues of --. Enova International's net income of $43.4M is higher than Community Bankers's net income of --. Notably, Enova International's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while Community Bankers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enova International is 1.14x versus -- for Community Bankers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Horizon Technology Finance has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Enova International's net margin of 80.24%. Enova International's return on equity of 15.1% beat Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -1.15%.

Enova International has a consensus price target of $108.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.49%. On the other hand Horizon Technology Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that Horizon Technology Finance has higher upside potential than Enova International, analysts believe Horizon Technology Finance is more attractive than Enova International.

Enova International has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.177%.

Enova International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Horizon Technology Finance offers a yield of 14.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Enova International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Horizon Technology Finance pays out -235.81% of its earnings as a dividend.

Enova International quarterly revenues are $689.9M, which are larger than Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues of $9.1M. Enova International's net income of $43.4M is higher than Horizon Technology Finance's net income of $7.3M. Notably, Enova International's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while Horizon Technology Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enova International is 1.14x versus 73.71x for Horizon Technology Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Medallion Financial has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Enova International's net margin of 17.62%. Enova International's return on equity of 15.1% beat Medallion Financial's return on equity of 9.63%.

Enova International has a consensus price target of $108.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.49%. On the other hand Medallion Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.26%. Given that Medallion Financial has higher upside potential than Enova International, analysts believe Medallion Financial is more attractive than Enova International.

Enova International has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medallion Financial has a beta of 2.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.686%.

Enova International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Medallion Financial offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Enova International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial pays out 13.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enova International quarterly revenues are $689.9M, which are larger than Medallion Financial quarterly revenues of $48.9M. Enova International's net income of $43.4M is higher than Medallion Financial's net income of $8.6M. Notably, Enova International's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while Medallion Financial's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enova International is 1.14x versus 1.16x for Medallion Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PRA Group has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Enova International's net margin of 9.58%. Enova International's return on equity of 15.1% beat PRA Group's return on equity of 3.55%.

Enova International has a consensus price target of $108.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.49%. On the other hand PRA Group has an analysts' consensus of $29.33 which suggests that it could grow by 42.05%. Given that PRA Group has higher upside potential than Enova International, analysts believe PRA Group is more attractive than Enova International.

Enova International has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PRA Group has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.931%.

Enova International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PRA Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enova International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PRA Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enova International quarterly revenues are $689.9M, which are larger than PRA Group quarterly revenues of $283.6M. Enova International's net income of $43.4M is higher than PRA Group's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Enova International's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.73x while PRA Group's PE ratio is 18.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enova International is 1.14x versus 0.77x for PRA Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.