PRAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a net margin of -129.38% compared to PRA Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. PRA Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.6% beat Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s return on equity of --.

PRA Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.55%. On the other hand Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PRA Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania), analysts believe PRA Group, Inc. is more attractive than Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania).

PRA Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a beta of -0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.415%.

PRA Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania) offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. PRA Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PRA Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312.2M, which are larger than Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania) quarterly revenues of --. PRA Group, Inc.'s net income of -$404M is higher than Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s net income of --. Notably, PRA Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PRA Group, Inc. is 0.56x versus -- for Community Bankers' Corp. (Pennsylvania). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enova International, Inc. has a net margin of -129.38% compared to PRA Group, Inc.'s net margin of 10.01%. PRA Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.6% beat Enova International, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.09%.

PRA Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.55%. On the other hand Enova International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $140.63 which suggests that it could grow by 3.28%. Given that PRA Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enova International, Inc., analysts believe PRA Group, Inc. is more attractive than Enova International, Inc..

PRA Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enova International, Inc. has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.325%.

PRA Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enova International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PRA Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enova International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PRA Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312.2M, which are smaller than Enova International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $802.7M. PRA Group, Inc.'s net income of -$404M is lower than Enova International, Inc.'s net income of $80.3M. Notably, PRA Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Enova International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PRA Group, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.21x for Enova International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Horizon Technology Finance Corp. has a net margin of -129.38% compared to PRA Group, Inc.'s net margin of -136.46%. PRA Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.6% beat Horizon Technology Finance Corp.'s return on equity of -7.55%.

PRA Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.55%. On the other hand Horizon Technology Finance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $6.80 which suggests that it could grow by 1.49%. Given that PRA Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Horizon Technology Finance Corp., analysts believe PRA Group, Inc. is more attractive than Horizon Technology Finance Corp..

PRA Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horizon Technology Finance Corp. has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.746%.

PRA Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Horizon Technology Finance Corp. offers a yield of 19.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. PRA Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Horizon Technology Finance Corp. pays out 823.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

PRA Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312.2M, which are larger than Horizon Technology Finance Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. PRA Group, Inc.'s net income of -$404M is lower than Horizon Technology Finance Corp.'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, PRA Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Horizon Technology Finance Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PRA Group, Inc. is 0.56x versus 4.36x for Horizon Technology Finance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Medallion Financial Corp. has a net margin of -129.38% compared to PRA Group, Inc.'s net margin of 16.24%. PRA Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.6% beat Medallion Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.17%.

PRA Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.55%. On the other hand Medallion Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that PRA Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Medallion Financial Corp., analysts believe PRA Group, Inc. is more attractive than Medallion Financial Corp..

PRA Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medallion Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.179%.

PRA Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Medallion Financial Corp. offers a yield of 4.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. PRA Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial Corp. pays out 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PRA Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312.2M, which are larger than Medallion Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.8M. PRA Group, Inc.'s net income of -$404M is lower than Medallion Financial Corp.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, PRA Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.62x while Medallion Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PRA Group, Inc. is 0.56x versus 0.71x for Medallion Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.