Financhill
Sell
22

HRZN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$7.58
Seasonality move :
2.39%
Day range:
$7.53 - $7.68
52-week range:
$7.12 - $12.63
Dividend yield:
17.44%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
158.57x
P/B ratio:
1.00x
Volume:
405K
Avg. volume:
553K
1-year change:
-35.85%
Market cap:
$305.5M
Revenue:
$1.7M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.91

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance
$26.7M $0.33 152.61% 25.3% $7.96
AGM.A
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
-- -- -- -- --
CTYP
Community Bankers
-- -- -- -- --
ENVA
Enova International
$734.1M $2.76 20.54% 56.13% $126.86
MFIN
Medallion Financial
$51.7M $0.32 11.71% -- $11.00
PRAA
PRA Group
$286M $0.41 -2.54% 13.89% $25.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance
$7.57 $7.96 $305.5M -- $0.11 17.44% 158.57x
AGM.A
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
$137.00 -- $1.5B 8.33x $1.50 4.16% 4.01x
CTYP
Community Bankers
$5.88 -- $13.3M -- $0.02 0.34% --
ENVA
Enova International
$94.65 $126.86 $2.4B 11.15x $0.00 0% 0.94x
MFIN
Medallion Financial
$9.17 $11.00 $213.1M 5.73x $0.11 4.58% 1.01x
PRAA
PRA Group
$13.44 $25.33 $533M 7.51x $0.00 0% 0.47x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance
60.47% 0.648 122.99% 3.45x
AGM.A
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
95.16% 0.962 1442.6% 1.18x
CTYP
Community Bankers
-- -0.975 -- --
ENVA
Enova International
75.85% 2.028 152.24% 19.99x
MFIN
Medallion Financial
45.03% -0.177 114.84% 0.98x
PRAA
PRA Group
73.98% 0.215 394.3% 14.12x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance
-- -- -4.57% -10.86% 63.47% -$13.2M
AGM.A
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
-- -- 0.7% 14.11% 365.83% $367.5M
CTYP
Community Bankers
-- -- -- -- -- --
ENVA
Enova International
$345.6M $91.4M 5.15% 19.93% 12.25% $378.3M
MFIN
Medallion Financial
-- -- 5.32% 8.77% 73.52% $36.3M
PRAA
PRA Group
$162.1M $40.4M 1.59% 5.75% 14.07% -$53.5M

Horizon Technology Finance vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns HRZN or AGM.A?

    Federal Agricultural Mortgage has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of 55.76%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -10.86% beat Federal Agricultural Mortgage's return on equity of 14.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    -- -$0.53 $772.7M
    AGM.A
    Federal Agricultural Mortgage
    -- $4.63 $30.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About HRZN or AGM.A?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $7.96, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand Federal Agricultural Mortgage has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Horizon Technology Finance has higher upside potential than Federal Agricultural Mortgage, analysts believe Horizon Technology Finance is more attractive than Federal Agricultural Mortgage.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    0 5 0
    AGM.A
    Federal Agricultural Mortgage
    0 0 0
  • Is HRZN or AGM.A More Risky?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federal Agricultural Mortgage has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.431%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRZN or AGM.A?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.44%. Federal Agricultural Mortgage offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -823.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Agricultural Mortgage pays out 41.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Agricultural Mortgage's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRZN or AGM.A?

    Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are -$19.5M, which are smaller than Federal Agricultural Mortgage quarterly revenues of $101.4M. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Federal Agricultural Mortgage's net income of $56.5M. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Federal Agricultural Mortgage's PE ratio is 8.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 158.57x versus 4.01x for Federal Agricultural Mortgage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    158.57x -- -$19.5M -$21.4M
    AGM.A
    Federal Agricultural Mortgage
    4.01x 8.33x $101.4M $56.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns HRZN or CTYP?

    Community Bankers has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of --. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -10.86% beat Community Bankers's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    -- -$0.53 $772.7M
    CTYP
    Community Bankers
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About HRZN or CTYP?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $7.96, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand Community Bankers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Horizon Technology Finance has higher upside potential than Community Bankers, analysts believe Horizon Technology Finance is more attractive than Community Bankers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    0 5 0
    CTYP
    Community Bankers
    0 0 0
  • Is HRZN or CTYP More Risky?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Bankers has a beta of -0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.674%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRZN or CTYP?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.44%. Community Bankers offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -823.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Bankers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRZN or CTYP?

    Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are -$19.5M, which are larger than Community Bankers quarterly revenues of --. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of -$21.4M is higher than Community Bankers's net income of --. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Community Bankers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 158.57x versus -- for Community Bankers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    158.57x -- -$19.5M -$21.4M
    CTYP
    Community Bankers
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns HRZN or ENVA?

    Enova International has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of 9.78%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -10.86% beat Enova International's return on equity of 19.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    -- -$0.53 $772.7M
    ENVA
    Enova International
    46.36% $2.69 $5B
  • What do Analysts Say About HRZN or ENVA?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $7.96, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand Enova International has an analysts' consensus of $126.86 which suggests that it could grow by 34.03%. Given that Enova International has higher upside potential than Horizon Technology Finance, analysts believe Enova International is more attractive than Horizon Technology Finance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    0 5 0
    ENVA
    Enova International
    4 1 0
  • Is HRZN or ENVA More Risky?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enova International has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.209%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRZN or ENVA?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.44%. Enova International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -823.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Enova International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRZN or ENVA?

    Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are -$19.5M, which are smaller than Enova International quarterly revenues of $745.5M. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Enova International's net income of $72.9M. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enova International's PE ratio is 11.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 158.57x versus 0.94x for Enova International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    158.57x -- -$19.5M -$21.4M
    ENVA
    Enova International
    0.94x 11.15x $745.5M $72.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns HRZN or MFIN?

    Medallion Financial has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of 19.96%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -10.86% beat Medallion Financial's return on equity of 8.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    -- -$0.53 $772.7M
    MFIN
    Medallion Financial
    -- $0.50 $760.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About HRZN or MFIN?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $7.96, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand Medallion Financial has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.96%. Given that Medallion Financial has higher upside potential than Horizon Technology Finance, analysts believe Medallion Financial is more attractive than Horizon Technology Finance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    0 5 0
    MFIN
    Medallion Financial
    0 2 0
  • Is HRZN or MFIN More Risky?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medallion Financial has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.397%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRZN or MFIN?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.44%. Medallion Financial offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -823.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial pays out 26.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRZN or MFIN?

    Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are -$19.5M, which are smaller than Medallion Financial quarterly revenues of $60.2M. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Medallion Financial's net income of $12M. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Medallion Financial's PE ratio is 5.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 158.57x versus 1.01x for Medallion Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    158.57x -- -$19.5M -$21.4M
    MFIN
    Medallion Financial
    1.01x 5.73x $60.2M $12M
  • Which has Higher Returns HRZN or PRAA?

    PRA Group has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of 1.35%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -10.86% beat PRA Group's return on equity of 5.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    -- -$0.53 $772.7M
    PRAA
    PRA Group
    59.6% $0.09 $4.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About HRZN or PRAA?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of $7.96, signalling upside risk potential of 5.13%. On the other hand PRA Group has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 88.49%. Given that PRA Group has higher upside potential than Horizon Technology Finance, analysts believe PRA Group is more attractive than Horizon Technology Finance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    0 5 0
    PRAA
    PRA Group
    1 2 0
  • Is HRZN or PRAA More Risky?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PRA Group has a beta of 1.699, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.859%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRZN or PRAA?

    Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.44%. PRA Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -823.19% of its earnings as a dividend. PRA Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRZN or PRAA?

    Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are -$19.5M, which are smaller than PRA Group quarterly revenues of $272M. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of -$21.4M is lower than PRA Group's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PRA Group's PE ratio is 7.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 158.57x versus 0.47x for PRA Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRZN
    Horizon Technology Finance
    158.57x -- -$19.5M -$21.4M
    PRAA
    PRA Group
    0.47x 7.51x $272M $3.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?

Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…

Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?

Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…

3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now

The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 12

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 25.71% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 12

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 1.94% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 12

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is up 4.18% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock