HRZN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Bankers has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of --. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -1.15% beat Community Bankers's return on equity of --.

Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand Community Bankers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Horizon Technology Finance has higher upside potential than Community Bankers, analysts believe Horizon Technology Finance is more attractive than Community Bankers.

Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Bankers has a beta of -0.467, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.666%.

Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.77%. Community Bankers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -235.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Bankers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are larger than Community Bankers quarterly revenues of --. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of $7.3M is higher than Community Bankers's net income of --. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Community Bankers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 73.71x versus -- for Community Bankers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enova International has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of 6.29%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -1.15% beat Enova International's return on equity of 15.1%.

Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand Enova International has an analysts' consensus of $108.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Horizon Technology Finance has higher upside potential than Enova International, analysts believe Horizon Technology Finance is more attractive than Enova International.

Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enova International has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.51%.

Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.77%. Enova International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -235.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Enova International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are smaller than Enova International quarterly revenues of $689.9M. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of $7.3M is lower than Enova International's net income of $43.4M. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enova International's PE ratio is 15.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 73.71x versus 1.14x for Enova International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Medallion Financial has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of 17.62%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -1.15% beat Medallion Financial's return on equity of 9.63%.

Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand Medallion Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.26%. Given that Medallion Financial has higher upside potential than Horizon Technology Finance, analysts believe Medallion Financial is more attractive than Horizon Technology Finance.

Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medallion Financial has a beta of 2.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.686%.

Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.77%. Medallion Financial offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -235.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial pays out 13.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Medallion Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are smaller than Medallion Financial quarterly revenues of $48.9M. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of $7.3M is lower than Medallion Financial's net income of $8.6M. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Medallion Financial's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 73.71x versus 1.16x for Medallion Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PRA Group has a net margin of 80.24% compared to Horizon Technology Finance's net margin of 9.58%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of -1.15% beat PRA Group's return on equity of 3.55%.

Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.86%. On the other hand PRA Group has an analysts' consensus of $29.33 which suggests that it could grow by 42.05%. Given that PRA Group has higher upside potential than Horizon Technology Finance, analysts believe PRA Group is more attractive than Horizon Technology Finance.

Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PRA Group has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.931%.

Horizon Technology Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.77%. PRA Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Horizon Technology Finance pays -235.81% of its earnings as a dividend. PRA Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Horizon Technology Finance quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are smaller than PRA Group quarterly revenues of $283.6M. Horizon Technology Finance's net income of $7.3M is lower than PRA Group's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Horizon Technology Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PRA Group's PE ratio is 18.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Horizon Technology Finance is 73.71x versus 0.77x for PRA Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.