MRCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 79.34% compared to Monroe Capital's net margin of 99.99%. Monroe Capital's return on equity of 6.43% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

Monroe Capital has a consensus price target of $8.42, signalling downside risk potential of -0.39%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.9%. Given that Gladstone Investment has higher upside potential than Monroe Capital, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Monroe Capital.

Monroe Capital has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.622%.

Monroe Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.83%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Monroe Capital pays 5839.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Monroe Capital's is not.

Monroe Capital quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Monroe Capital's net income of $5M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, Monroe Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.08x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monroe Capital is 10.11x versus 13.17x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 79.34% compared to Monroe Capital's net margin of 98.44%. Monroe Capital's return on equity of 6.43% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68%.

Monroe Capital has a consensus price target of $8.42, signalling downside risk potential of -0.39%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.33%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Monroe Capital, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Monroe Capital.

Monroe Capital has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.151%.

Monroe Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.83%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Monroe Capital pays 5839.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monroe Capital quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $94.2M. Monroe Capital's net income of $5M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M. Notably, Monroe Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.08x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 10.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monroe Capital is 10.11x versus 11.18x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 79.34% compared to Monroe Capital's net margin of 89.54%. Monroe Capital's return on equity of 6.43% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

Monroe Capital has a consensus price target of $8.42, signalling downside risk potential of -0.39%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.91 which suggests that it could grow by 11.32%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Monroe Capital, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Monroe Capital.

Monroe Capital has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.968%.

Monroe Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.83%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Monroe Capital pays 5839.89% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monroe Capital quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. Monroe Capital's net income of $5M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, Monroe Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.08x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monroe Capital is 10.11x versus 7.20x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 79.34% compared to Monroe Capital's net margin of -121.48%. Monroe Capital's return on equity of 6.43% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

Monroe Capital has a consensus price target of $8.42, signalling downside risk potential of -0.39%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 11.37%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Monroe Capital, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Monroe Capital.

Monroe Capital has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.634%.

Monroe Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.83%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Monroe Capital pays 5839.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monroe Capital quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Monroe Capital's net income of $5M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Monroe Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.08x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monroe Capital is 10.11x versus 21.20x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.