DBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conduent has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of -1.5%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Conduent's return on equity of 55.8%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.57%. On the other hand Conduent has an analysts' consensus of $7.03 which suggests that it could grow by 241.42%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Diebold Nixdorf, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Diebold Nixdorf.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduent has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.379%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conduent offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent pays out 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Conduent quarterly revenues of $800M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is higher than Conduent's net income of -$12M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Conduent's PE ratio is 0.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.43x versus 0.12x for Conduent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of -26.62%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.57%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.14%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Castellum.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 488.969%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.43x versus 1.24x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of 4.19%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.57%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.7%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 10.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.43x versus 9.85x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of 4.51%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 68.57%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 67.27%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.296%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.3M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 343.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.43x versus 3.16x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.