CNDT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Conduent's net margin of -11.03%. Conduent's return on equity of 61.77% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Conduent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.12%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.88%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Castellum.

Conduent has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduent pays -3.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $807M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Conduent's net income of $123M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.73x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.22x versus 1.36x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Conduent's net margin of 4.19%. Conduent's return on equity of 61.77% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 23.63%.

Conduent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.12%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

Conduent has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduent pays -3.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $807M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $20.1M. Conduent's net income of $123M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of $843K. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.73x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 26.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.22x versus 13.07x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Information Services Group has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Conduent's net margin of 1.87%. Conduent's return on equity of 61.77% beat Information Services Group's return on equity of -3.1%.

Conduent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.12%. On the other hand Information Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.58 which suggests that it could grow by 78.38%. Given that Information Services Group has higher upside potential than Conduent, analysts believe Information Services Group is more attractive than Conduent.

Conduent has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Information Services Group has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.67900000000001%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Information Services Group offers a yield of 5.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Conduent pays -3.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Information Services Group pays out 141.16% of its earnings as a dividend.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $807M, which are larger than Information Services Group quarterly revenues of $61.3M. Conduent's net income of $123M is higher than Information Services Group's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.73x while Information Services Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.22x versus 0.61x for Information Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Conduent's net margin of --. Conduent's return on equity of 61.77% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Conduent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.12%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.53%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Conduent has a beta of 1.444, which suggesting that the stock is 44.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduent pays -3.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $807M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Conduent's net income of $123M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.73x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.22x versus 10.44x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.