KD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.61%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.27%. On the other hand BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.67 which suggests that it could grow by 50.49%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $33.1M. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $57M is higher than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.19x versus 9.77x for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.15%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of 14.97%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.27%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $91.40 which suggests that it could grow by 28.89%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.946%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. pays out 27.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $57M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s net income of $648M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.19x versus 1.64x for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EPAM Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.66%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat EPAM Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.2%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.27%. On the other hand EPAM Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $227.76 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, Inc., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than EPAM Systems, Inc..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.53%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than EPAM Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $57M is lower than EPAM Systems, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while EPAM Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.19x versus 1.91x for EPAM Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 28.34%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 37.05%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.27%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $324.95 which suggests that it could grow by 19.11%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.275%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 60.07% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $57M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $5.6B. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.19x versus 3.83x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.