KD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EPAM Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.66%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat EPAM Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.2%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.60, signalling upside risk potential of 49.15%. On the other hand EPAM Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $220.67 which suggests that it could grow by 3.79%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, Inc., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than EPAM Systems, Inc..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.609%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than EPAM Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $68M is lower than EPAM Systems, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while EPAM Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus 2.28x for EPAM Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.13%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.77%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.60, signalling upside risk potential of 49.15%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.31%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.392%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $104.2M. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $68M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 56.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus 1.94x for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.68%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.60, signalling upside risk potential of 49.15%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $302.05 which suggests that it could fall by -1.18%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.088%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.3B. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $68M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus 4.42x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 40.37%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.7%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.60, signalling upside risk potential of 49.15%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $189.48 which suggests that it could grow by 10.83%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Palantir Technologies, Inc..

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.423%.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $68M is lower than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $476.7M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.86x while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 399.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is 0.40x versus 112.06x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.