EPAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

F5 has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 19.91%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat F5's return on equity of 19.89%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $217.64, signalling upside risk potential of 22.89%. On the other hand F5 has an analysts' consensus of $289.69 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than F5.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F5 has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.349%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F5 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. F5 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than F5 quarterly revenues of $731.1M. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is lower than F5's net income of $145.5M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.77x while F5's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.10x versus 5.42x for F5. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 2.9%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $217.64, signalling upside risk potential of 22.89%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 30.82%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.695%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.77x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 116.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.10x versus 3.14x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 24.22%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $217.64, signalling upside risk potential of 22.89%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $94.23 which suggests that it could fall by -19.67%. Given that EPAM Systems has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe EPAM Systems is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.77x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 510.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.10x versus 93.72x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upbound Group has a net margin of 5.65% compared to EPAM Systems's net margin of 2.11%. EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63% beat Upbound Group's return on equity of 19.48%.

EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $217.64, signalling upside risk potential of 22.89%. On the other hand Upbound Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.16%. Given that Upbound Group has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Upbound Group is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upbound Group has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.431%.

EPAM Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upbound Group offers a yield of 6.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. EPAM Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upbound Group pays out 66.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Upbound Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EPAM Systems quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Upbound Group quarterly revenues of $1.2B. EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M is higher than Upbound Group's net income of $24.8M. Notably, EPAM Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.77x while Upbound Group's PE ratio is 11.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EPAM Systems is 2.10x versus 0.30x for Upbound Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.