INGM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net margin of 4.57%. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 7.48% beat Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.27%.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $96.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.68%. Given that Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., analysts believe Ingram Micro Holding Corp. is more attractive than Diebold Nixdorf, Inc..

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingram Micro Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are larger than Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.'s net income of $50.5M. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding Corp. is 0.10x versus 0.78x for Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ExlService Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net margin of 10.98%. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 7.48% beat ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.83%.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand ExlService Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $52.14 which suggests that it could grow by 73.58%. Given that ExlService Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ingram Micro Holding Corp., analysts believe ExlService Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Ingram Micro Holding Corp..

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ExlService Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.512%.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. ExlService Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingram Micro Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ExlService Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are larger than ExlService Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $529.6M. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $58.2M. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding Corp. is 0.10x versus 2.42x for ExlService Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks, Inc. has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net margin of 85.95%. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 7.48% beat Freshworks, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.12%.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Freshworks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.31 which suggests that it could grow by 83.81%. Given that Freshworks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ingram Micro Holding Corp., analysts believe Freshworks, Inc. is more attractive than Ingram Micro Holding Corp..

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Freshworks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingram Micro Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are larger than Freshworks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $222.7M. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net income of $99.5M is lower than Freshworks, Inc.'s net income of $191.4M. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while Freshworks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding Corp. is 0.10x versus 2.51x for Freshworks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penguin Solutions has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net margin of --. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 7.48% beat Penguin Solutions's return on equity of --.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $24.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Penguin Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Penguin Solutions, analysts believe Ingram Micro Holding Corp. is more attractive than Penguin Solutions.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penguin Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Penguin Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingram Micro Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penguin Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingram Micro Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are larger than Penguin Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Penguin Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Ingram Micro Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while Penguin Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingram Micro Holding Corp. is 0.10x versus -- for Penguin Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.