CURB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of 62.44%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.8%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.81, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.86 which suggests that it could grow by 20.68%. Given that Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Curbline Properties Corp., analysts believe Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Curbline Properties Corp..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. pays out 106.04% of its earnings as a dividend.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is lower than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s net income of $248.3M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.06x while Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 14.85x versus 7.87x for Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of -19.83%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.3%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.81, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.32%. Given that Curbline Properties Corp. has higher upside potential than Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc., analysts believe Curbline Properties Corp. is more attractive than Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.342%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. offers a yield of 6.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. pays out 68.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues of $297.8M. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is higher than Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of -$59M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.06x while Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 14.85x versus 4.92x for Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of 14.79%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.81, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.58 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that Curbline Properties Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe Curbline Properties Corp. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays out 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.1M. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is lower than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.06x while Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 14.85x versus 6.90x for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of 76.79%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat VICI Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.4%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.81, signalling upside risk potential of 15.52%. On the other hand VICI Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.48 which suggests that it could grow by 26.12%. Given that VICI Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Curbline Properties Corp., analysts believe VICI Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Curbline Properties Corp..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.886%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. VICI Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc. pays out 66.29% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than VICI Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is lower than VICI Properties, Inc.'s net income of $773.6M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.06x while VICI Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 14.85x versus 7.51x for VICI Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.