CURB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of -15.58%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.13%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.92 which suggests that it could grow by 21.75%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Curbline Properties Corp., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Curbline Properties Corp..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.464%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays out 334.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $705.9M. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is higher than Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$110M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.18x while Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 79.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 15.13x versus 4.28x for Healthpeak Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of 62.44%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.8%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.63 which suggests that it could grow by 25.39%. Given that Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Curbline Properties Corp., analysts believe Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Curbline Properties Corp..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 7.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. pays out 106.04% of its earnings as a dividend.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is lower than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s net income of $248.3M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.18x while Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 15.13x versus 7.54x for Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of -9.84%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.02%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could fall by -60.61%. Given that Curbline Properties Corp. has higher upside potential than Opendoor Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Curbline Properties Corp. is more attractive than Opendoor Technologies, Inc..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 3.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 258.121%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $915M. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is higher than Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$90M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.18x while Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 15.13x versus 1.17x for Opendoor Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a net margin of 18.83% compared to Curbline Properties Corp.'s net margin of 14.79%. Curbline Properties Corp.'s return on equity of 2.34% beat Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.79, signalling upside risk potential of 13.26%. On the other hand Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.33 which suggests that it could grow by 12.9%. Given that Curbline Properties Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe Curbline Properties Corp. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Curbline Properties Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Curbline Properties Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Curbline Properties Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays out 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

Curbline Properties Corp. quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.1M. Curbline Properties Corp.'s net income of $9.2M is lower than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M. Notably, Curbline Properties Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.18x while Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curbline Properties Corp. is 15.13x versus 6.73x for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.