TRNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of 36.77% compared to Terreno Realty's net margin of 18.34%. Terreno Realty's return on equity of 5.13% beat Crown Castle's return on equity of 20.44%.

Terreno Realty has a consensus price target of $69.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.94 which suggests that it could grow by 29.82%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than Terreno Realty, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than Terreno Realty.

Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.594%.

Terreno Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 7.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. Terreno Realty pays 89.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out 181.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Terreno Realty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Crown Castle's is not.

Terreno Realty quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Terreno Realty's net income of $36.6M is lower than Crown Castle's net income of $303M. Notably, Terreno Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.37x while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 31.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terreno Realty is 14.89x versus 5.84x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of 36.77% compared to Terreno Realty's net margin of -0.69%. Terreno Realty's return on equity of 5.13% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -14.35%.

Terreno Realty has a consensus price target of $69.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 37.68%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Terreno Realty, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Terreno Realty.

Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.825%.

Terreno Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Terreno Realty pays 89.7% of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -317.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Terreno Realty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Terreno Realty quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Terreno Realty's net income of $36.6M is higher than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Terreno Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.37x while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terreno Realty is 14.89x versus 0.40x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 36.77% compared to Terreno Realty's net margin of 12.8%. Terreno Realty's return on equity of 5.13% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68%.

Terreno Realty has a consensus price target of $69.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Terreno Realty has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Terreno Realty is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.644%.

Terreno Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Terreno Realty pays 89.7% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Terreno Realty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Terreno Realty quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Terreno Realty's net income of $36.6M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Terreno Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.37x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 74.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terreno Realty is 14.89x versus 13.60x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 36.77% compared to Terreno Realty's net margin of -2883.88%. Terreno Realty's return on equity of 5.13% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

Terreno Realty has a consensus price target of $69.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Terreno Realty has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Terreno Realty is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.92% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Terreno Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Terreno Realty pays 89.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Terreno Realty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Terreno Realty quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. Terreno Realty's net income of $36.6M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Terreno Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.37x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terreno Realty is 14.89x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.