DOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Healthcare Realty Trust has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of -15.01%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat Healthcare Realty Trust's return on equity of -6.81%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand Healthcare Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $17.72 which suggests that it could grow by 16.52%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than Healthcare Realty Trust, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than Healthcare Realty Trust.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthcare Realty Trust has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.966%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. Healthcare Realty Trust offers a yield of 8.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthcare Realty Trust pays out -69.96% of its earnings as a dividend.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are larger than Healthcare Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $299M. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is higher than Healthcare Realty Trust's net income of -$44.9M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while Healthcare Realty Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.46x versus 4.46x for Healthcare Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 33.23%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $253.24 which suggests that it could grow by 4.66%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.015%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are larger than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $664.2M. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 32.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.46x versus 9.73x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 55.23%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat VICI Properties's return on equity of 9.94%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand VICI Properties has an analysts' consensus of $36.16 which suggests that it could grow by 14.12%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than VICI Properties, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than VICI Properties.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.435%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. VICI Properties offers a yield of 5.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties pays out 65.44% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are smaller than VICI Properties quarterly revenues of $984.2M. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is lower than VICI Properties's net income of $543.6M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while VICI Properties's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.46x versus 8.58x for VICI Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Healthpeak Properties's net margin of 4.71%. Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03% beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 3.7%.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $23.91, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $34.25 which suggests that it could grow by 30.93%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than Weyerhaeuser, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than Weyerhaeuser.

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.297% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.284%.

Healthpeak Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.34%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Healthpeak Properties pays 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 172.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues are $702.9M, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M is lower than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $83M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.53x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 52.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties is 4.46x versus 2.69x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.