DOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle, Inc. has a net margin of -15.58% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 4.29%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.13% beat Crown Castle, Inc.'s return on equity of -2538.65%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.58, signalling upside risk potential of 27.77%. On the other hand Crown Castle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $113.18 which suggests that it could grow by 28.2%. Given that Crown Castle, Inc. has higher upside potential than Healthpeak Properties, Inc., analysts believe Crown Castle, Inc. is more attractive than Healthpeak Properties, Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle, Inc. has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.267%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.57%. Crown Castle, Inc. offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 334.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle, Inc. pays out 69.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s is not.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.9M, which are smaller than Crown Castle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$110M is lower than Crown Castle, Inc.'s net income of $46M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 79.93x while Crown Castle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 7.95x for Crown Castle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a net margin of -15.58% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 62.44%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.13% beat Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.8%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.58, signalling upside risk potential of 27.77%. On the other hand Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.86 which suggests that it could grow by 20.68%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.57%. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 334.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. pays out 106.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.9M, which are larger than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$110M is lower than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s net income of $248.3M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 79.93x while Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 7.87x for Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a net margin of -15.58% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 14.79%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.13% beat Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.58, signalling upside risk potential of 27.77%. On the other hand Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.58 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.57%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 334.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays out 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.9M, which are larger than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.1M. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$110M is lower than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 79.93x while Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 6.90x for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties, Inc. has a net margin of -15.58% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 76.79%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.13% beat VICI Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.4%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.58, signalling upside risk potential of 27.77%. On the other hand VICI Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.48 which suggests that it could grow by 26.12%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than VICI Properties, Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than VICI Properties, Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.886%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.57%. VICI Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 334.64% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc. pays out 66.29% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s is not.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.9M, which are smaller than VICI Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$110M is lower than VICI Properties, Inc.'s net income of $773.6M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 79.93x while VICI Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 7.51x for VICI Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.