DOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 5.88%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat Digital Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.42%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.88, signalling upside risk potential of 22.08%. On the other hand Digital Realty Trust, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $194.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.59%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Digital Realty Trust, Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Digital Realty Trust, Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.302%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.12%. Digital Realty Trust, Inc. offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 1204.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Realty Trust, Inc. pays out 136.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are smaller than Digital Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of $121.7M is higher than Digital Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of $96.1M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 161.03x while Digital Realty Trust, Inc.'s PE ratio is 50.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 10.26x for Digital Realty Trust, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of -9.84%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.02%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.88, signalling upside risk potential of 22.08%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could fall by -1.07%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Opendoor Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Opendoor Technologies, Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 3.673, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 267.293%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.12%. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 1204.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $915M. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of $121.7M is higher than Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$90M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 161.03x while Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 0.68x for Opendoor Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 76.79%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat VICI Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.4%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.88, signalling upside risk potential of 22.08%. On the other hand VICI Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.13 which suggests that it could grow by 20.89%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than VICI Properties, Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than VICI Properties, Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.715%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.12%. VICI Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 1204.37% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc. pays out 66.29% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s is not.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are smaller than VICI Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of $121.7M is lower than VICI Properties, Inc.'s net income of $773.6M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 161.03x while VICI Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 7.76x for VICI Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ventas, Inc. has a net margin of 16.91% compared to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 4.66%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.16% beat Ventas, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.16%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.88, signalling upside risk potential of 22.08%. On the other hand Ventas, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $88.70 which suggests that it could grow by 4.11%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ventas, Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Ventas, Inc..

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ventas, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.07%.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.12%. Ventas, Inc. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays 1204.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Ventas, Inc. pays out 353.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $719.4M, which are smaller than Ventas, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of $121.7M is higher than Ventas, Inc.'s net income of $73M. Notably, Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 161.03x while Ventas, Inc.'s PE ratio is 157.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is 4.01x versus 6.75x for Ventas, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.