CRGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matador Resources Co. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 21.92%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat Matador Resources Co.'s return on equity of 15.9%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.62, signalling upside risk potential of 67.68%. On the other hand Matador Resources Co. has an analysts' consensus of $58.26 which suggests that it could grow by 37.9%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Matador Resources Co., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Matador Resources Co..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources Co. has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.692%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Matador Resources Co. offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources Co. pays out 11.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are smaller than Matador Resources Co. quarterly revenues of $915.1M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Matador Resources Co.'s net income of $200.6M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Matador Resources Co.'s PE ratio is 6.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.49x versus 1.38x for Matador Resources Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy Corp. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 18.65%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat Mexco Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 9.05%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.62, signalling upside risk potential of 67.68%. On the other hand Mexco Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy Corp., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Mexco Energy Corp..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.308, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.155%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Mexco Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy Corp. pays out 12.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are larger than Mexco Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Mexco Energy Corp.'s net income of $323.5K. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Mexco Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.49x versus 2.97x for Mexco Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of -26.57%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.75%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.62, signalling upside risk potential of 67.68%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.70 which suggests that it could grow by 40.38%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.158%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. offers a yield of 8.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. pays out 31.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. quarterly revenues of $485.9M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is higher than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.'s net income of -$129.1M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.49x versus 0.99x for Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Pacific Land Corp. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 59.7%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat Texas Pacific Land Corp.'s return on equity of 39.39%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.62, signalling upside risk potential of 67.68%. On the other hand Texas Pacific Land Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $842.50 which suggests that it could fall by -9.95%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land Corp., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land Corp..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Pacific Land Corp. has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.438%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Texas Pacific Land Corp. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Pacific Land Corp. pays out 25.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are larger than Texas Pacific Land Corp. quarterly revenues of $203.1M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Texas Pacific Land Corp.'s net income of $121.2M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Texas Pacific Land Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.49x versus 18.58x for Texas Pacific Land Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.