CRGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

VAALCO Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of -64.54%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of 3.64% beat VAALCO Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.46%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $15.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand VAALCO Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.43 which suggests that it could grow by 34.72%. Given that VAALCO Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy Co., analysts believe VAALCO Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Crescent Energy Co..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VAALCO Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.657%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. VAALCO Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 88.71% of its earnings as a dividend. VAALCO Energy, Inc. pays out 44.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $865M, which are larger than VAALCO Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $91M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of $9M is higher than VAALCO Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$58.8M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.13x while VAALCO Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 1.02x versus 1.81x for VAALCO Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Murphy Oil Corp. has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 3.63%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of 3.64% beat Murphy Oil Corp.'s return on equity of 2.61%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $15.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand Murphy Oil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $39.47 which suggests that it could fall by -3.93%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Murphy Oil Corp., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Murphy Oil Corp..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murphy Oil Corp. has a beta of 0.593, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.668%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. Murphy Oil Corp. offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 88.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil Corp. pays out 179.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Energy Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Murphy Oil Corp.'s is not.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $865M, which are larger than Murphy Oil Corp. quarterly revenues of $613.1M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of $9M is lower than Murphy Oil Corp.'s net income of $22.3M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.13x while Murphy Oil Corp.'s PE ratio is 57.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 1.02x versus 2.20x for Murphy Oil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ovintiv, Inc. has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 45.66%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of 3.64% beat Ovintiv, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.89%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $15.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand Ovintiv, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $66.87 which suggests that it could grow by 12.19%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Ovintiv, Inc., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Ovintiv, Inc..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ovintiv, Inc. has a beta of 0.590, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.001%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. Ovintiv, Inc. offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 88.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Ovintiv, Inc. pays out 25.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $865M, which are smaller than Ovintiv, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of $9M is lower than Ovintiv, Inc.'s net income of $946M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.13x while Ovintiv, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 1.02x versus 1.74x for Ovintiv, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy Co. has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 15.46%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of 3.64% beat SM Energy Co.'s return on equity of 14.24%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $15.87, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand SM Energy Co. has an analysts' consensus of $35.19 which suggests that it could grow by 8.78%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than SM Energy Co., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than SM Energy Co..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy Co. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.069%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. SM Energy Co. offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 88.71% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy Co. pays out 14.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $865M, which are larger than SM Energy Co. quarterly revenues of $705M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of $9M is lower than SM Energy Co.'s net income of $109M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.13x while SM Energy Co.'s PE ratio is 5.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 1.02x versus 1.16x for SM Energy Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.