CRGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of -26.57%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.75%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.21, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.90 which suggests that it could grow by 6.22%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.325%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. offers a yield of 6.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. pays out 31.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. quarterly revenues of $485.9M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is higher than Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.'s net income of -$129.1M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.65x versus 1.28x for Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ovintiv, Inc. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 7.26%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat Ovintiv, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.28%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.21, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand Ovintiv, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.24 which suggests that it could grow by 7.23%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Ovintiv, Inc., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Ovintiv, Inc..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ovintiv, Inc. has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.964%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Ovintiv, Inc. offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ovintiv, Inc. pays out 28.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are smaller than Ovintiv, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Ovintiv, Inc.'s net income of $148M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Ovintiv, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.65x versus 1.48x for Ovintiv, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Pacific Land Corp. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of 58.3%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat Texas Pacific Land Corp.'s return on equity of 37.29%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.21, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand Texas Pacific Land Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $300.00 which suggests that it could fall by -43.69%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land Corp., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land Corp..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Pacific Land Corp. has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.421%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Texas Pacific Land Corp. offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Pacific Land Corp. pays out 30.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are larger than Texas Pacific Land Corp. quarterly revenues of $211.6M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Texas Pacific Land Corp.'s net income of $123.3M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Texas Pacific Land Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.65x versus 36.03x for Texas Pacific Land Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore, Inc. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Crescent Energy Co.'s net margin of -56.05%. Crescent Energy Co.'s return on equity of -0.27% beat W&T Offshore, Inc.'s return on equity of -579.3%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a consensus price target of $13.21, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand W&T Offshore, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.11%. Given that Crescent Energy Co. has higher upside potential than W&T Offshore, Inc., analysts believe Crescent Energy Co. is more attractive than W&T Offshore, Inc..

Crescent Energy Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore, Inc. has a beta of 0.349, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.103%.

Crescent Energy Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. W&T Offshore, Inc. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Crescent Energy Co. pays 47.26% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore, Inc. pays out 6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy Co. quarterly revenues are $866.6M, which are larger than W&T Offshore, Inc. quarterly revenues of $127.5M. Crescent Energy Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is higher than W&T Offshore, Inc.'s net income of -$71.5M. Notably, Crescent Energy Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while W&T Offshore, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy Co. is 0.65x versus 0.79x for W&T Offshore, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.