TPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 63.71% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 14.51%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.85% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 21.75%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.47%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.48%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.067%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $185.8M, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $118.4M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $639M. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.11x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 6.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 41.23x versus 1.13x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 63.71% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 29.06%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.85% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.47%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $193.64 which suggests that it could grow by 52.3%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.265%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $185.8M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $118.4M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.11x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 41.23x versus 2.46x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 63.71% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of -1.88%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.85% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.47%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $51.52 which suggests that it could grow by 36.3%. Given that Occidental Petroleum has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Occidental Petroleum is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $185.8M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $118.4M is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.11x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 15.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 41.23x versus 1.37x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 63.71% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 9.39%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.85% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.47%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.95 which suggests that it could grow by 21.19%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $185.8M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $118.4M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.11x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 41.23x versus 1.31x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.