NOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 13.06% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of -9%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 24.2% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling upside risk potential of 65.56%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $7.38 which suggests that it could grow by 64.62%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.152%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.83%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 10.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $549.2M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $71.7M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.81x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 89.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.16x versus 1.70x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 13.06% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of -4786.13%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 24.2% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -93.33%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling upside risk potential of 65.56%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.253%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.83%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $549.2M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $166.5K. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $71.7M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$8M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.81x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.16x versus 11.08x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 13.06% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 21.93%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 24.2% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.31%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling upside risk potential of 65.56%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $72.71 which suggests that it could grow by 71.07%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 2.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 174.1%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.83%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $549.2M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $978.3M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $71.7M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $214.5M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.81x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.16x versus 1.52x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 13.06% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 6.78%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 24.2% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling upside risk potential of 65.56%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 232.01%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.003%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.83%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 31.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $549.2M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $71.7M is higher than Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.81x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.16x versus 0.49x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.