NOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California Resources has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 34.85%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat California Resources's return on equity of 22.28%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $48.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.17%. On the other hand California Resources has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.49%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than California Resources.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, which suggesting that the stock is 85.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. California Resources offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources pays out 14.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are smaller than California Resources quarterly revenues of $990M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is lower than California Resources's net income of $345M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while California Resources's PE ratio is 7.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.66x versus 1.45x for California Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Ridge Resources has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 9.62%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat Granite Ridge Resources's return on equity of 7.21%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $48.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.17%. On the other hand Granite Ridge Resources has an analysts' consensus of $7.56 which suggests that it could grow by 22.13%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Granite Ridge Resources, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Granite Ridge Resources.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, which suggesting that the stock is 85.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Ridge Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. Granite Ridge Resources offers a yield of 7.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Ridge Resources pays out 72.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are larger than Granite Ridge Resources quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is higher than Granite Ridge Resources's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while Granite Ridge Resources's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.66x versus 2.13x for Granite Ridge Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 15.8%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 13.88%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $48.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.17%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $62.14 which suggests that it could grow by 31.86%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, which suggesting that the stock is 85.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.474%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is lower than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 12.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.66x versus 1.66x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 37.44%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $48.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.17%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $56.36 which suggests that it could grow by 45.4%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, which suggesting that the stock is 85.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.189%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. SM Energy offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is higher than SM Energy's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 5.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.66x versus 1.74x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.