BTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 1.48%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -7.06%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $28.60, signalling upside risk potential of 48.26%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.15%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Hallador Energy, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Hallador Energy.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.927%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $105M. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.10x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.64x versus 1.10x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 25.36%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of -4.51%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $28.60, signalling upside risk potential of 48.26%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.03%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than NACCO Industries, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than NACCO Industries.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.084%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out -16.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $15.6M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.10x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.64x versus 1.04x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 73.91%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 38.17%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $28.60, signalling upside risk potential of 48.26%. On the other hand Natural Resources Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -86.48%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.58%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Natural Resources Partners LP offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues of $52.2M. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is higher than Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.10x while Natural Resources Partners LP's PE ratio is 9.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.64x versus 6.02x for Natural Resources Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 9.31% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 9.81%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $28.60, signalling upside risk potential of 48.26%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.06 which suggests that it could grow by 19.49%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.284%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Peabody Energy pays 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.10x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.64x versus 1.34x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.