ARLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of 1.48%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 24.23% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -7.06%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $26.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.84%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.15%. Given that Hallador Energy has higher upside potential than Alliance Resource Partners LP, analysts believe Hallador Energy is more attractive than Alliance Resource Partners LP.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.927%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.68%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 57.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alliance Resource Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $613.6M, which are larger than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $105M. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $86.3M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.45x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.35x versus 1.10x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of 25.36%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 24.23% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of -4.51%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $26.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.84%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.03%. Given that NACCO Industries has higher upside potential than Alliance Resource Partners LP, analysts believe NACCO Industries is more attractive than Alliance Resource Partners LP.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.084%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.68%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 57.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out -16.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Alliance Resource Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $613.6M, which are larger than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $86.3M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $15.6M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.45x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.35x versus 1.04x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of 73.91%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 24.23% beat Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 38.17%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $26.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.84%. On the other hand Natural Resources Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -86.48%. Given that Alliance Resource Partners LP has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Alliance Resource Partners LP is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.58%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.68%. Natural Resources Partners LP offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 57.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $613.6M, which are larger than Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues of $52.2M. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $86.3M is higher than Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.45x while Natural Resources Partners LP's PE ratio is 9.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.35x versus 6.02x for Natural Resources Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of -72.12%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 24.23% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $26.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.84%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.29%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Alliance Resource Partners LP, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Alliance Resource Partners LP.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 18.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.534%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.68%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 57.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $613.6M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $86.3M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.45x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.35x versus 0.60x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.