NRP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a net margin of 73.91% compared to Natural Resources Partners LP's net margin of 14.06%. Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 38.17% beat Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 24.23%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -86.48%. On the other hand Alliance Resource Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $26.08 which suggests that it could grow by 4.84%. Given that Alliance Resource Partners LP has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Alliance Resource Partners LP is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.045%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Alliance Resource Partners LP offers a yield of 10.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Natural Resources Partners LP pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays out 57.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues of $613.6M. Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $38.6M is lower than Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $86.3M. Notably, Natural Resources Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Alliance Resource Partners LP's PE ratio is 7.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Resources Partners LP is 6.02x versus 1.35x for Alliance Resource Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peabody Energy has a net margin of 73.91% compared to Natural Resources Partners LP's net margin of 9.31%. Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 38.17% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity of 14.74%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -86.48%. On the other hand Peabody Energy has an analysts' consensus of $28.60 which suggests that it could grow by 48.26%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.878%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Peabody Energy offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Natural Resources Partners LP pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than Peabody Energy quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $38.6M is lower than Peabody Energy's net income of $101.3M. Notably, Natural Resources Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Peabody Energy's PE ratio is 5.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Resources Partners LP is 6.02x versus 0.64x for Peabody Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 73.91% compared to Natural Resources Partners LP's net margin of 1.48%. Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 38.17% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -7.06%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -86.48%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.15%. Given that Hallador Energy has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Hallador Energy is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.927%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Resources Partners LP pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $105M. Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $38.6M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Natural Resources Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Resources Partners LP is 6.02x versus 1.10x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 73.91% compared to Natural Resources Partners LP's net margin of 25.36%. Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 38.17% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of -4.51%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -86.48%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.03%. Given that NACCO Industries has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe NACCO Industries is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.58% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.084%.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Natural Resources Partners LP pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out -16.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $38.6M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $15.6M. Notably, Natural Resources Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Resources Partners LP is 6.02x versus 1.04x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.