AMPY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ring Energy has a net margin of -10.76% compared to Amplify Energy's net margin of 6.78%. Amplify Energy's return on equity of 3.26% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21%.

Amplify Energy has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 281.04%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.47 which suggests that it could grow by 308.19%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Amplify Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Amplify Energy.

Amplify Energy has a beta of 0.368, which suggesting that the stock is 63.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.456%.

Amplify Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amplify Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amplify Energy quarterly revenues are $69M, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Amplify Energy's net income of -$7.4M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Amplify Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Energy is 0.36x versus 0.46x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SandRidge Energy has a net margin of -10.76% compared to Amplify Energy's net margin of 45.12%. Amplify Energy's return on equity of 3.26% beat SandRidge Energy's return on equity of 14.19%.

Amplify Energy has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 281.04%. On the other hand SandRidge Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 102.34%. Given that Amplify Energy has higher upside potential than SandRidge Energy, analysts believe Amplify Energy is more attractive than SandRidge Energy.

Amplify Energy has a beta of 0.368, which suggesting that the stock is 63.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SandRidge Energy has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.07%.

Amplify Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SandRidge Energy offers a yield of 4.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Amplify Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SandRidge Energy pays out 114.85% of its earnings as a dividend.

Amplify Energy quarterly revenues are $69M, which are larger than SandRidge Energy quarterly revenues of $39M. Amplify Energy's net income of -$7.4M is lower than SandRidge Energy's net income of $17.6M. Notably, Amplify Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while SandRidge Energy's PE ratio is 5.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Energy is 0.36x versus 2.79x for SandRidge Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of -10.76% compared to Amplify Energy's net margin of 21.71%. Amplify Energy's return on equity of 3.26% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29%.

Amplify Energy has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 281.04%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $38.43 which suggests that it could grow by 78.57%. Given that Amplify Energy has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Amplify Energy is more attractive than SM Energy.

Amplify Energy has a beta of 0.368, which suggesting that the stock is 63.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 2.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.291%.

Amplify Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Amplify Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amplify Energy quarterly revenues are $69M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $839.6M. Amplify Energy's net income of -$7.4M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $182.3M. Notably, Amplify Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Energy is 0.36x versus 0.84x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of -10.76% compared to Amplify Energy's net margin of -19.41%. Amplify Energy's return on equity of 3.26% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Amplify Energy has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 281.04%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 762.07%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Amplify Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Amplify Energy.

Amplify Energy has a beta of 0.368, which suggesting that the stock is 63.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.477%.

Amplify Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Amplify Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out -6.77% of its earnings as a dividend.

Amplify Energy quarterly revenues are $69M, which are smaller than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $120.3M. Amplify Energy's net income of -$7.4M is higher than W&T Offshore's net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Amplify Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Energy is 0.36x versus 0.32x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.