Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
29
AKA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.53
Seasonality move
:
-34.22%
Day range:
$10.25 - $11.00
52-week range:
$7.00 - $21.49
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.20x
P/B ratio:
1.10x
Volume:
5.9K
Avg. volume:
11.3K
1-year change:
-49.84%
Market cap:
$120.6M
Revenue:
$574.7M
EPS (TTM):
-$2.46
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AKA
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
|
$154.9M | -$0.38 | 3.41% | -7.38% | $19.75 |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$4.5B | $5.15 | 4.48% | 22.08% | $600.00 |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
$983.5M | $0.26 | 15.39% | 3.78% | $186.00 |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$217.8M | -$0.64 | -9.66% | -14.05% | $6.00 |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.80 | -3.45% | 75.59% | $31.50 |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$3.7B | $0.48 | 6.85% | 7.9% | $63.15 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AKA
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
|
$11.23 | $19.75 | $120.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$567.05 | $600.00 | $21B | 34.87x | $0.57 | 0.38% | 1.25x |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
$187.81 | $186.00 | $10.4B | 33.72x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.35x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$4.10 | $6.00 | $261M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$28.00 | $31.50 | $843.3M | 300.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$51.08 | $63.15 | $27B | 24.65x | $0.23 | 1.8% | 1.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AKA
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
|
65.69% | 3.544 | 204.01% | 0.30x |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
43.37% | 0.318 | 15.31% | 0.60x |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
50.81% | 3.164 | 23.22% | 0.48x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
63.27% | 0.328 | 127.91% | 0.14x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
48.95% | 3.450 | 94.06% | 0.43x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
68.98% | 0.357 | 19.02% | 0.07x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AKA
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.
|
$82.4M | -$360K | -8.42% | -22.27% | -0.25% | $317K |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$1B | $298.7M | 9.4% | 17.14% | 6.63% | $176M |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
$302.5M | $43.3M | 8.06% | 16.84% | 4.17% | -$133.2M |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$63.9M | -$50.5M | -33.28% | -63.15% | -23.47% | -$145.6M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$331M | $38M | 0.27% | 0.62% | 2.34% | $78M |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$1.3B | $342.7M | 13.93% | 46.58% | 9.22% | $30.3M |
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AKA or CASY?
Casey's General Stores, Inc. has a net margin of -3.37% compared to a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net margin of 4.58%. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -22.27% beat Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.56.06% -$0.46 $320.9M CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.22.42% $5.53 $6.7B -
What do Analysts Say About AKA or CASY?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling upside risk potential of 83.21%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $600.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.61%. Given that a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, Inc., analysts believe a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is more attractive than Casey's General Stores, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.2 3 0 CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.11 5 0 -
Is AKA or CASY More Risky?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores, Inc. has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AKA or CASY?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casey's General Stores, Inc. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores, Inc. pays out 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AKA or CASY?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $147.1M, which are smaller than Casey's General Stores, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net income of -$5M is lower than Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 1.25x for Casey's General Stores, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.0.20x -- $147.1M -$5M CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.1.25x 34.87x $4.5B $206.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns AKA or FIVE?
Five Below, Inc. has a net margin of -3.37% compared to a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net margin of 3.52%. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -22.27% beat Five Below, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.56.06% -$0.46 $320.9M FIVEFive Below, Inc.29.14% $0.66 $4B -
What do Analysts Say About AKA or FIVE?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling upside risk potential of 83.21%. On the other hand Five Below, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $186.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.96%. Given that a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Five Below, Inc., analysts believe a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is more attractive than Five Below, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.2 3 0 FIVEFive Below, Inc.11 10 0 -
Is AKA or FIVE More Risky?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below, Inc. has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.681%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AKA or FIVE?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AKA or FIVE?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $147.1M, which are smaller than Five Below, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net income of -$5M is lower than Five Below, Inc.'s net income of $36.5M. Notably, a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five Below, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 2.35x for Five Below, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.0.20x -- $147.1M -$5M FIVEFive Below, Inc.2.35x 33.72x $1B $36.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns AKA or FLWS?
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a net margin of -3.37% compared to a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net margin of -24.61%. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -22.27% beat 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.56.06% -$0.46 $320.9M FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.29.68% -$0.83 $592.1M -
What do Analysts Say About AKA or FLWS?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling upside risk potential of 83.21%. On the other hand 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.34%. Given that a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc., analysts believe a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is more attractive than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.2 3 0 FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is AKA or FLWS More Risky?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AKA or FLWS?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AKA or FLWS?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $147.1M, which are smaller than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $215.2M. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net income of -$5M is higher than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M. Notably, a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.16x for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.0.20x -- $147.1M -$5M FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0.16x -- $215.2M -$53M
-
Which has Higher Returns AKA or ODP?
The ODP Corp. has a net margin of -3.37% compared to a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net margin of 1.42%. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -22.27% beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.56.06% -$0.46 $320.9M ODPThe ODP Corp.20.37% $0.77 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About AKA or ODP?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling upside risk potential of 83.21%. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than The ODP Corp., analysts believe a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is more attractive than The ODP Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.2 3 0 ODPThe ODP Corp.0 1 0 -
Is AKA or ODP More Risky?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.282%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AKA or ODP?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AKA or ODP?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $147.1M, which are smaller than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net income of -$5M is lower than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 300.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.0.20x -- $147.1M -$5M ODPThe ODP Corp.0.13x 300.11x $1.6B $23M
-
Which has Higher Returns AKA or TSCO?
Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of -3.37% compared to a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net margin of 6.97%. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -22.27% beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 46.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.56.06% -$0.46 $320.9M TSCOTractor Supply Co.34.02% $0.49 $8.3B -
What do Analysts Say About AKA or TSCO?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling upside risk potential of 83.21%. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.15 which suggests that it could grow by 23.63%. Given that a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply Co., analysts believe a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is more attractive than Tractor Supply Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.2 3 0 TSCOTractor Supply Co.15 11 0 -
Is AKA or TSCO More Risky?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.659%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AKA or TSCO?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 43.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AKA or TSCO?
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $147.1M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s net income of -$5M is lower than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $259.3M. Notably, a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 24.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 1.77x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AKAa.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.0.20x -- $147.1M -$5M TSCOTractor Supply Co.1.77x 24.65x $3.7B $259.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 24
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 4.16% over the past day.
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.99% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 3.04% over the past day.
