AGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings has a net margin of 2.45% compared to PlayAGS's net margin of -26.81%. PlayAGS's return on equity of 10.6% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02%.

PlayAGS has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $51.19 which suggests that it could grow by 37.43%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than PlayAGS, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than PlayAGS.

PlayAGS has a beta of 2.315, which suggesting that the stock is 131.505% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.898, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.784%.

PlayAGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PlayAGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PlayAGS quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. PlayAGS's net income of $2.4M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M. Notably, PlayAGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.49x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PlayAGS is 1.19x versus 3.94x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of 2.45% compared to PlayAGS's net margin of 4.36%. PlayAGS's return on equity of 10.6% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of --.

PlayAGS has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 54.11%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than PlayAGS, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than PlayAGS.

PlayAGS has a beta of 2.315, which suggesting that the stock is 131.505% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.445%.

PlayAGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PlayAGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PlayAGS quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are larger than Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues of $78M. PlayAGS's net income of $2.4M is lower than Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M. Notably, PlayAGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.49x while Inspired Entertainment's PE ratio is 76.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PlayAGS is 1.19x versus 0.85x for Inspired Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of 2.45% compared to PlayAGS's net margin of 7.83%. PlayAGS's return on equity of 10.6% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6%.

PlayAGS has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $108.83 which suggests that it could grow by 26.41%. Given that Light & Wonder has higher upside potential than PlayAGS, analysts believe Light & Wonder is more attractive than PlayAGS.

PlayAGS has a beta of 2.315, which suggesting that the stock is 131.505% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.734, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.396%.

PlayAGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PlayAGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PlayAGS quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are smaller than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $817M. PlayAGS's net income of $2.4M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $64M. Notably, PlayAGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.49x while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PlayAGS is 1.19x versus 2.50x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of 2.45% compared to PlayAGS's net margin of -6.67%. PlayAGS's return on equity of 10.6% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

PlayAGS has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.85%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PlayAGS has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe PlayAGS is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

PlayAGS has a beta of 2.315, which suggesting that the stock is 131.505% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PlayAGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PlayAGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PlayAGS quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. PlayAGS's net income of $2.4M is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, PlayAGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.49x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PlayAGS is 1.19x versus 1.19x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.