INSE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings has a net margin of 81.93% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of -9.68%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16%.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.72%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $57.67 which suggests that it could grow by 46.04%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than DraftKings, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than DraftKings.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.446%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $83M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $68M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.86x versus 4.07x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of 81.93% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of 13.55%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 43.3%.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.72%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $114.76 which suggests that it could grow by 10.69%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.588, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.78%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $83M, which are smaller than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $797M. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $68M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $108M. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 28.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.86x versus 2.95x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of 81.93% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of -6.67%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.72%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $83M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $68M is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.86x versus 0.89x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of 81.93% compared to Inspired Entertainment's net margin of 0.8%. Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of -- beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 1.32%.

Inspired Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 52.72%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $15.86 which suggests that it could grow by 44.68%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive.

Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.383% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inspired Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inspired Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues are $83M, which are smaller than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $254.2M. Inspired Entertainment's net income of $68M is higher than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $2M. Notably, Inspired Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is 584.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inspired Entertainment is 0.86x versus 1.42x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.