GBR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five Point Holdings LLC has a net margin of -51.28% compared to New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 77.28%. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.7% beat Five Point Holdings LLC's return on equity of 8.04%.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Five Point Holdings LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 126.84%. Given that Five Point Holdings LLC has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, Inc., analysts believe Five Point Holdings LLC is more attractive than New Concept Energy, Inc..

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, which suggesting that the stock is 8.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Point Holdings LLC has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.393%.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Point Holdings LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Concept Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Point Holdings LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Concept Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than Five Point Holdings LLC quarterly revenues of $75.9M. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20K is lower than Five Point Holdings LLC's net income of $58.7M. Notably, New Concept Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five Point Holdings LLC's PE ratio is 6.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Concept Energy, Inc. is 24.35x versus 7.18x for Five Point Holdings LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gyrodyne LLC has a net margin of -51.28% compared to New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.7% beat Gyrodyne LLC's return on equity of --.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gyrodyne LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New Concept Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gyrodyne LLC, analysts believe New Concept Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Gyrodyne LLC.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, which suggesting that the stock is 8.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gyrodyne LLC has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.137%.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gyrodyne LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Concept Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gyrodyne LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Concept Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39K, which are larger than Gyrodyne LLC quarterly revenues of --. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20K is higher than Gyrodyne LLC's net income of --. Notably, New Concept Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gyrodyne LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Concept Energy, Inc. is 24.35x versus 2.97x for Gyrodyne LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -51.28% compared to New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -8.76%. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.7% beat Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.59%.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.25%. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, Inc., analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than New Concept Energy, Inc..

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, which suggesting that the stock is 8.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.552%.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. New Concept Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. pays out 426.41% of its earnings as a dividend.

New Concept Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $116.4M. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20K is higher than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.2M. Notably, New Concept Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Concept Energy, Inc. is 24.35x versus 2.61x for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has a net margin of -51.28% compared to New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.7% beat Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.74%.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New Concept Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., analysts believe New Concept Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc..

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, which suggesting that the stock is 8.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.596%.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Concept Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Concept Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39K, which are smaller than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.8M. New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20K is lower than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s net income of $884K. Notably, New Concept Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 82.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Concept Energy, Inc. is 24.35x versus 9.48x for Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.