NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
27
KW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.09
Seasonality move
:
2.39%
Day range:
$9.92 - $10.22
52-week range:
$7.85 - $12.74
Dividend yield:
7.16%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.59x
P/B ratio:
1.68x
Volume:
2.5M
Avg. volume:
596.6K
1-year change:
-18.82%
Market cap:
$1.4B
Revenue:
$562.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$2.58
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
-- | -$0.11 | -- | -40% | $10.70 |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
$696.1M | $0.16 | 9.52% | -6.21% | $90.38 |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
$78.2M | $0.36 | -2.02% | 220.66% | $9.13 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
$10.05 | $10.70 | $1.4B | -- | $0.12 | 7.16% | 2.59x |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
$71.47 | $90.38 | $29.3B | 162.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 10.92x |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
$1.14 | -- | $5.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 39.80x |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
$2.28 | -- | $20M | 47.71x | $0.01 | 0.88% | 2.67x |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
$1.11 | -- | $3.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.19x |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
$11.05 | $9.13 | $208.5M | -- | $0.23 | 0% | 0.67x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
76.43% | 0.697 | 222.94% | 1.27x |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
11.69% | 0.825 | 3.21% | 9.49x |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
-- | -0.358 | -- | 7.05x |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
66.4% | 1.710 | 78.31% | 1.15x |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
79.12% | 4.002 | 335.32% | 0.24x |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
51.08% | 2.503 | -176.77% | 0.79x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings
|
$88.5M | $16.9M | -4.44% | -17.44% | -8.31% | -$27.7M |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group
|
$552M | $23.7M | 2.1% | 2.39% | 3.42% | $13.7M |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy
|
-- | -$56K | -0.83% | -0.83% | -151.35% | $14K |
|
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
|
$882.1K | -$130.3K | -7.22% | -36.77% | -6.88% | -$146.7K |
|
PW
Power REIT
|
$932.6K | $392.1K | -39.63% | -104.5% | 38.39% | -$161.8K |
|
RMAX
RE/MAX Holdings
|
$58.4M | $15.2M | -2.56% | -- | 20.61% | $16.3M |
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or CSGP?
CoStar Group has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of 7.65%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat CoStar Group's return on equity of 2.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B CSGPCoStar Group79.7% $0.13 $8.5B -
What do Analysts Say About KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand CoStar Group has an analysts' consensus of $90.38 which suggests that it could grow by 26.47%. Given that CoStar Group has higher upside potential than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, analysts believe CoStar Group is more attractive than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 CSGPCoStar Group5 4 0 -
Is KW or CSGP More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoStar Group has a beta of 0.828, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. CoStar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. CoStar Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are smaller than CoStar Group quarterly revenues of $692.6M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than CoStar Group's net income of $53M. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoStar Group's PE ratio is 162.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.59x versus 10.92x for CoStar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.59x -- $127.5M -$66.6M CSGPCoStar Group10.92x 162.42x $692.6M $53M
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or GBR?
New Concept Energy has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -10.81%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B GBRNew Concept Energy-- -$0.01 $4.6M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than New Concept Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 GBRNew Concept Energy0 0 0 -
Is KW or GBR More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.296, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.439%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $37K. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than New Concept Energy's net income of -$4K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.59x versus 39.80x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.59x -- $127.5M -$66.6M GBRNew Concept Energy39.80x -- $37K -$4K
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or IHT?
InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -15.14%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B IHTInnSuites Hospitality Trust48.33% -$0.03 $12M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or IHT?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 IHTInnSuites Hospitality Trust0 0 0 -
Is KW or IHT More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.314%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or IHT?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or IHT?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 47.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.59x versus 2.67x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.59x -- $127.5M -$66.6M IHTInnSuites Hospitality Trust2.67x 47.71x $1.8M -$276.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or PW?
Power REIT has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of -22.79%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat Power REIT's return on equity of -104.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B PWPower REIT65.4% -$0.14 $46.8M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or PW?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand Power REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3863.96%. Given that Power REIT has higher upside potential than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, analysts believe Power REIT is more attractive than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 PWPower REIT0 0 0 -
Is KW or PW More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power REIT has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.267%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or PW?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. Power REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Power REIT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or PW?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than Power REIT quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than Power REIT's net income of -$325K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power REIT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.59x versus 1.19x for Power REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.59x -- $127.5M -$66.6M PWPower REIT1.19x -- $1.4M -$325K
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or RMAX?
RE/MAX Holdings has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net margin of 1.23%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's return on equity of -17.44% beat RE/MAX Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings69.41% -$0.56 $6.9B RMAXRE/MAX Holdings74.39% $0.05 $380M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or RMAX?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.93%. On the other hand RE/MAX Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.13 which suggests that it could fall by -11.77%. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has higher upside potential than RE/MAX Holdings, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is more attractive than RE/MAX Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings0 1 0 RMAXRE/MAX Holdings0 5 1 -
Is KW or RMAX More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RE/MAX Holdings has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.79%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or RMAX?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. RE/MAX Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings pays -56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. RE/MAX Holdings pays out -19.64% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or RMAX?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings quarterly revenues are $127.5M, which are larger than RE/MAX Holdings quarterly revenues of $78.5M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's net income of -$66.6M is lower than RE/MAX Holdings's net income of $966K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RE/MAX Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is 2.59x versus 0.67x for RE/MAX Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings2.59x -- $127.5M -$66.6M RMAXRE/MAX Holdings0.67x -- $78.5M $966K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.65% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 4.9% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.4% over the past day.
