Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
40
KW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.72
Seasonality move
:
-1.99%
Day range:
$9.78 - $10.00
52-week range:
$5.98 - $10.11
Dividend yield:
4.91%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.61x
P/B ratio:
1.83x
Volume:
635.3K
Avg. volume:
736K
1-year change:
9.4%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$531.4M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.26
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.
|
$233M | $0.04 | 71.92% | -87.5% | $10.00 |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
|
$889.9M | $0.27 | 23.88% | 86.45% | $80.11 |
|
FPH
Five Point Holdings LLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GYRO
Gyrodyne LLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TCI
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.
|
$9.78 | $10.00 | $1.3B | -- | $0.12 | 4.91% | 2.61x |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
|
$47.87 | $80.11 | $20.3B | 931.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.51x |
|
FPH
Five Point Holdings LLC
|
$5.29 | -- | $376.2M | 6.59x | $0.00 | 0% | 7.18x |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy, Inc.
|
$0.73 | -- | $3.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 24.35x |
|
GYRO
Gyrodyne LLC
|
$8.87 | -- | $19.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.97x |
|
TCI
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
|
$53.57 | -- | $462.8M | 82.36x | $0.00 | 0% | 9.48x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.
|
75.14% | 0.919 | 234.37% | 0.85x |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
|
11.61% | 0.000 | 3.16% | 3.01x |
|
FPH
Five Point Holdings LLC
|
34.46% | 1.076 | 22.82% | 1.59x |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy, Inc.
|
-- | 4.620 | -- | 4.87x |
|
GYRO
Gyrodyne LLC
|
-- | 0.998 | -- | -- |
|
TCI
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
|
21.05% | 1.471 | 53.48% | 29.07x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.
|
$49.1M | -$2.3M | 0.15% | 0.59% | -1.98% | $123.2M |
|
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
|
$629.6M | -$31.2M | 0.22% | 0.25% | -3.74% | -$23.6M |
|
FPH
Five Point Holdings LLC
|
$34.8M | $18.9M | 6.47% | 8.04% | 24.87% | $40.4M |
|
GBR
New Concept Energy, Inc.
|
$25K | -$63K | -1.7% | -1.7% | -161.54% | -$49K |
|
GYRO
Gyrodyne LLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TCI
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
|
$198K | -$1.4M | 0.6% | 0.74% | -10.88% | -$6.6M |
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or CSGP?
CoStar Group, Inc. has a net margin of -8.76% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -3.71%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.59% beat CoStar Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.42.18% -$0.15 $6.2B CSGPCoStar Group, Inc.75.53% -$0.07 $9.8B -
What do Analysts Say About KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand CoStar Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $80.11 which suggests that it could grow by 67.34%. Given that CoStar Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc., analysts believe CoStar Group, Inc. is more attractive than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.0 1 0 CSGPCoStar Group, Inc.10 5 1 -
Is KW or CSGP More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoStar Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.399%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. CoStar Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. pays 426.41% of its earnings as a dividend. CoStar Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or CSGP?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are smaller than CoStar Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $833.6M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.2M is higher than CoStar Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.9M. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoStar Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 931.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is 2.61x versus 6.51x for CoStar Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.2.61x -- $116.4M -$10.2M CSGPCoStar Group, Inc.6.51x 931.32x $833.6M -$30.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or FPH?
Five Point Holdings LLC has a net margin of -8.76% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 77.28%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.59% beat Five Point Holdings LLC's return on equity of 8.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.42.18% -$0.15 $6.2B FPHFive Point Holdings LLC45.91% $0.15 $2.8B -
What do Analysts Say About KW or FPH?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Five Point Holdings LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 126.84%. Given that Five Point Holdings LLC has higher upside potential than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Five Point Holdings LLC is more attractive than Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.0 1 0 FPHFive Point Holdings LLC0 0 0 -
Is KW or FPH More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Point Holdings LLC has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.393%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or FPH?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. Five Point Holdings LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. pays 426.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Five Point Holdings LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or FPH?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Five Point Holdings LLC quarterly revenues of $75.9M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.2M is lower than Five Point Holdings LLC's net income of $58.7M. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five Point Holdings LLC's PE ratio is 6.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is 2.61x versus 7.18x for Five Point Holdings LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.2.61x -- $116.4M -$10.2M FPHFive Point Holdings LLC7.18x 6.59x $75.9M $58.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or GBR?
New Concept Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -8.76% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -51.28%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.59% beat New Concept Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.42.18% -$0.15 $6.2B GBRNew Concept Energy, Inc.64.1% -$0.00 $4.5M -
What do Analysts Say About KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand New Concept Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, Inc., analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than New Concept Energy, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.0 1 0 GBRNew Concept Energy, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is KW or GBR More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.052%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. New Concept Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. pays 426.41% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or GBR?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than New Concept Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39K. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.2M is lower than New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Concept Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is 2.61x versus 24.35x for New Concept Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.2.61x -- $116.4M -$10.2M GBRNew Concept Energy, Inc.24.35x -- $39K -$20K
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or GYRO?
Gyrodyne LLC has a net margin of -8.76% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.59% beat Gyrodyne LLC's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.42.18% -$0.15 $6.2B GYROGyrodyne LLC-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KW or GYRO?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Gyrodyne LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gyrodyne LLC, analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Gyrodyne LLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.0 1 0 GYROGyrodyne LLC0 0 0 -
Is KW or GYRO More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gyrodyne LLC has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.137%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or GYRO?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. Gyrodyne LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. pays 426.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Gyrodyne LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or GYRO?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Gyrodyne LLC quarterly revenues of --. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.2M is higher than Gyrodyne LLC's net income of --. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gyrodyne LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is 2.61x versus 2.97x for Gyrodyne LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.2.61x -- $116.4M -$10.2M GYROGyrodyne LLC2.97x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KW or TCI?
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has a net margin of -8.76% compared to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.59% beat Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.42.18% -$0.15 $6.2B TCITranscontinental Realty Investors, Inc.1.54% $0.08 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About KW or TCI?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., analysts believe Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.0 1 0 TCITranscontinental Realty Investors, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is KW or TCI More Risky?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.596%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KW or TCI?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. pays 426.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KW or TCI?
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.8M. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.2M is lower than Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s net income of $884K. Notably, Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 82.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is 2.61x versus 9.48x for Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWKennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.2.61x -- $116.4M -$10.2M TCITranscontinental Realty Investors, Inc.9.48x 82.36x $12.8M $884K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.
