TCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Concept Energy has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Transcontinental Realty Investors's net margin of -10.81%. Transcontinental Realty Investors's return on equity of 0.38% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.83%.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental Realty Investors has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Transcontinental Realty Investors is more attractive than New Concept Energy.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.330, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.016%.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental Realty Investors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transcontinental Realty Investors quarterly revenues are $11.1M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $37K. Transcontinental Realty Investors's net income of $1.7M is higher than New Concept Energy's net income of -$4K. Notably, Transcontinental Realty Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.53x while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental Realty Investors is 5.49x versus 41.20x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gyrodyne LLC has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Transcontinental Realty Investors's net margin of --. Transcontinental Realty Investors's return on equity of 0.38% beat Gyrodyne LLC's return on equity of --.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gyrodyne LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental Realty Investors has higher upside potential than Gyrodyne LLC, analysts believe Transcontinental Realty Investors is more attractive than Gyrodyne LLC.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gyrodyne LLC has a beta of 0.523, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.711%.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gyrodyne LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental Realty Investors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gyrodyne LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transcontinental Realty Investors quarterly revenues are $11.1M, which are larger than Gyrodyne LLC quarterly revenues of --. Transcontinental Realty Investors's net income of $1.7M is higher than Gyrodyne LLC's net income of --. Notably, Transcontinental Realty Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.53x while Gyrodyne LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental Realty Investors is 5.49x versus 0.23x for Gyrodyne LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Transcontinental Realty Investors's net margin of -15.14%. Transcontinental Realty Investors's return on equity of 0.38% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental Realty Investors has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe Transcontinental Realty Investors is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.207, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.252%.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Transcontinental Realty Investors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental Realty Investors quarterly revenues are $11.1M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Transcontinental Realty Investors's net income of $1.7M is higher than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, Transcontinental Realty Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.53x while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 43.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental Realty Investors is 5.49x versus 2.94x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power REIT has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Transcontinental Realty Investors's net margin of -22.79%. Transcontinental Realty Investors's return on equity of 0.38% beat Power REIT's return on equity of -104.5%.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2814.1%. Given that Power REIT has higher upside potential than Transcontinental Realty Investors, analysts believe Power REIT is more attractive than Transcontinental Realty Investors.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power REIT has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.793%.

Transcontinental Realty Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental Realty Investors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power REIT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transcontinental Realty Investors quarterly revenues are $11.1M, which are larger than Power REIT quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Transcontinental Realty Investors's net income of $1.7M is higher than Power REIT's net income of -$325K. Notably, Transcontinental Realty Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.53x while Power REIT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental Realty Investors is 5.49x versus 1.62x for Power REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.