ABR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 17.38% compared to Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of -51.28%. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.61% beat New Concept Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.7%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.19%. On the other hand New Concept Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, Inc., analysts believe Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is more attractive than New Concept Energy, Inc..

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy, Inc. has a beta of -0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.158%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.84%. New Concept Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. pays 145.75% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $299.4M, which are larger than New Concept Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39K. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of $52M is higher than New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20K. Notably, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while New Concept Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.51x versus 25.66x for New Concept Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LTC Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 17.38% compared to Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of -26.43%. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.61% beat LTC Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.74%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.19%. On the other hand LTC Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.14 which suggests that it could grow by 7.02%. Given that Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than LTC Properties, Inc., analysts believe Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is more attractive than LTC Properties, Inc..

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LTC Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.093%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.84%. LTC Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. pays 145.75% of its earnings as a dividend. LTC Properties, Inc. pays out 111.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $299.4M, which are larger than LTC Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $70.7M. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of $52M is higher than LTC Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$18.7M. Notably, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while LTC Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.51x versus 7.00x for LTC Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Annaly Capital Management, Inc. has a net margin of 17.38% compared to Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 51.72%. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.61% beat Annaly Capital Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.28%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.19%. On the other hand Annaly Capital Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.10 which suggests that it could fall by -3.16%. Given that Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Annaly Capital Management, Inc., analysts believe Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Annaly Capital Management, Inc..

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Annaly Capital Management, Inc. has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.84%. Annaly Capital Management, Inc. offers a yield of 12.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. pays 145.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Annaly Capital Management, Inc. pays out 160.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $299.4M, which are smaller than Annaly Capital Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of $52M is lower than Annaly Capital Management, Inc.'s net income of $843.1M. Notably, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Annaly Capital Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.51x versus 2.03x for Annaly Capital Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. has a net margin of 17.38% compared to Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net margin of 15.81%. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.61% beat Starwood Property Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.4%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.19%. On the other hand Starwood Property Trust, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.57 which suggests that it could grow by 17.17%. Given that Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Starwood Property Trust, Inc., analysts believe Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Starwood Property Trust, Inc..

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.380, which suggesting that the stock is 37.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starwood Property Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.469%.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.84%. Starwood Property Trust, Inc. offers a yield of 10.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. pays 145.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Starwood Property Trust, Inc. pays out 174.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues are $299.4M, which are smaller than Starwood Property Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues of $489.9M. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s net income of $52M is lower than Starwood Property Trust, Inc.'s net income of $77.5M. Notably, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Starwood Property Trust, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is 1.51x versus 3.44x for Starwood Property Trust, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.